Teams

KTA 18+ 4.0

2023 Howard Columbia Adult 18 & Over · Howard Columbia Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.78 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2023-06-17vs CourtDogs 18+ 4.0Split 11
L#2 DoublesMichael Sesin / Mark Guo vs Bill Kenney / Armando Zamora2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 SinglesRizwan Rashid vs Nikhil Malvankar6-2, 6-4
2023-06-05vs Copsey 18+ 4.0Lost 02
L#1 SinglesRizwan Rashid vs Scott Mennealy3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesEric Putman / David Fenner vs Eric Oberer / Steve Newcomer5-7, 1-6
2023-05-23vs KG 18+ 4.0Lost 02
L#2 DoublesPatrick Vaughan / Michael Apanius vs Sean Der / Jay Anzures2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesRizwan Rashid / Eric Minor vs Nhat Ngo / Matt Galosky2-6, 3-6
2023-05-21vs MV 4.0 18+ 4.0Split 11
L#1 DoublesAmit Kapadia / Mark Guo vs George Lamont / Mikhail Laryukhin6-7, 0-6
W#3 DoublesMichael Apanius / George Sybert vs Richard Spicer / Zhuang Miao6-2, 6-1
2023-05-20vs I’d Hit That 18+ 4.0Split 11
L#2 SinglesRizwan Rashid vs Yuji Ohno0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMichael Apanius / Jevon Thompson vs Michael Erdely / James Mellendick1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-05-06vs Copsey 18+ 4.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesDavid Warren / Michael Sesin vs Scott Mennealy / Steve Newcomer0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMichael Apanius vs Raven Thio3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMark Guo / Eric Putman vs John Chae / Eric Oberer6-2, 7-5
2023-05-04vs AWeStrykn It 18+ 4.0Split 11
W#1 DoublesDavid Fenner / George Sybert vs Robert Fox / Daniel Berland7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesEric Putman / Faisal Sheikh vs Surendra Babu / Ilya Dondoshansky2-6, 1-6
2023-04-29vs CourtDogs 18+ 4.0Won 21
W#2 DoublesMark Guo / Omar Khan vs Tony Adson / Larry Wall4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMichael Apanius vs Karthik Suresh6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMichael Sesin / Rizwan Rashid vs Nikhil Malvankar / Sridhar Atluri3-6, 2-6
2023-04-25vs KG 18+ 4.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesOmar Khan / George Sybert vs Farooq Iqbal / Michael Green0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesRizwan Rashid vs Dat Doan1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesEric Putman / Michael Sesin vs Derrrick Ngo / John Shin2-6, 0-6
2023-04-15vs I’d Hit That 18+ 4.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesDavid Fenner / Mark Guo vs Lohiya Atluri / Michael Erdely1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesMichael Sesin / David Warren vs Sean Alewine / Maunank Shah2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesEric Putman / Rizwan Rashid vs Daniel Mansfield / Ray Yep5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2023-04-07vs MV 4.0 18+ 4.0Lost 04
L#1 DoublesMichael Apanius / Dan Fredman vs Alex Brousseau / Andrew Mullins2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesGeorge Sybert / David Fenner vs Richard Spicer / Bradley Jacques6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 SinglesMark Guo vs Shuang Chen4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesEric Putman / Michael Sesin vs Luke Dragonette / Rob Dragonette2-6, 0-6
2023-03-29vs AWeStrykn It 18+ 4.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMark Guo / George Sybert vs Ken Brown / Ilya Dondoshansky4-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesMichael Apanius vs Michael Warm6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDavid Fenner / Michael Sesin vs MIKHAIL MAKSIMENKO / Sean Miller4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Columbia Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Amit Kapadia
published 4
3.68
Michael Apanius
usually #2 Singles 29%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.64
Rizwan Rashid
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 4
3.52
Mark Guo
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.51
Omar Khan
published
3.48
Jevon Thompson
published
3.45
David Warren
published 3.5
3.45
Dan Fredman
published 4
3.37
George Sybert
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.30
Eric Putman
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Michael Sesin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Tam Banh
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Guo + Rizwan Rashid4453% games+14.4% vs expected
George Sybert + Eric Putman1636% gamesnot enough data
Eric Putman + Michael Sesin2445% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amit Kapadia
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Michael Apanius
74W–51L career · 6 lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Rizwan Rashid
62W–81L career · 7 lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
3.64
4
Mark Guo
68W–128L career · 7 lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
3.52
Omar Khan
8W–14L career · no lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.51
Jevon Thompson
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
3.48
3.5
David Warren
14W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%65%35%
3.45
4
Dan Fredman
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
66%34%<1%
3.45
3.5
George Sybert
234W–165L career · 12 lines in 2023
<1%84%15%
3.37
3.5
Eric Putman
134W–201L career · 15 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Michael Sesin
70W–72L career · 16 lines in 2023
1%93%5%
3.29
Tam Banh
5W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.