Teams

CTL55/EAKER/WRC

55 & Over · 55 & Over 9.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-05-18vs LLAS UPTA55A/Kim/SportsclubLost 12
L#1 DoublesJoseph Stricklin / Scott Swanson vs Kevin Hall / Brian Okraska7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesChristopher Eaker / David Moore vs Joo Ho Kim / Brian Laufenberg5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDon Jeter / Shawn Burke vs Daryl Tracey / Steve Miller6-4, 6-2
2025-05-18vs LLAS UPTA55A/WeinerLost 03
L#1 DoublesJoseph Stricklin / Scott Swanson vs John Jennings / Timothy Stewart5-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesGerald Sitton / Christopher Eaker vs Belton Thomason / Lee Chapman6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesShawn Burke / Jeffrey Hook vs Andrew Weiner / Christopher Chase4-6, 6-7
2025-05-17vs LCTA55/McKay/Wild DunesLost 02
L#2 DoublesJeffrey Hook / Scott Swanson vs Todd Hall / Russell Bridgham0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDon Jeter / Gerald Sitton vs Shawn Harris / Frederick McKay3-6, 4-6
2025-05-17vs BBTL55/Stone/DatawWon 20
W#1 DoublesJeffrey Hook / Joseph Stricklin vs Kevin McGuire / John McSween6-7, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGerald Sitton / Scott Swanson vs Bill Higgs / Todd Stone6-4, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over 9.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.96 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.26
Jeffrey Hook
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Don Jeter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.08
Joseph Stricklin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.93
Tim Tracy
published
3.91
Gerald Sitton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.90
Christopher Eaker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.66
Scott Fortson
published
Scott Swanson
published
Shawn Burke
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christopher Eaker + Gerald Sitton3453% gamesnot enough data
Shawn Burke + Jeffrey Hook134 matchesnot enough data
Christopher Eaker + Tim Tracy123 matchesnot enough data
Tim Tracy + Scott Fortson033 matchesnot enough data
Shawn Burke + Don Jeter123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeffrey Hook
24W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
4.26
4.5
Don Jeter
5W–27L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Joseph Stricklin
4W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
4.08
Tim Tracy
46W–35L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.93
4.5
Gerald Sitton
9W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
3.91
4.5
Christopher Eaker
26W–39L career · 2 lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
3.90
Scott Fortson
3W–17L career · no lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.66
Scott Swanson
21W–15L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Shawn Burke
7W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.