Teams

EMerritt

2022 Capital Combo 18 & Over · 6.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-10-10vs MGreenWon 10
W#2 DoublesLee Veit / Amy Clarke vs Melissa Green / Kathryn Kiel6-3, 6-2
2022-09-28vs KHuffstetler 18+Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAlison Uthe / Lee Veit vs Mary Jo Nugent / Harriet Volpe6-7, 5-7
2022-09-26vs ICconzola 18+ 6.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAlison Uthe / Amy Clarke vs Elizabeth Black / Kelly Townsend6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2022-09-19vs CSmith/KoppWon 10
W#1 DoublesJulia Kerr / Lee Veit vs Mandi Chappell / Crystal Smith7-6, 7-5
2022-09-12vs JLiddleWon 10
W#2 DoublesLee Veit / Julia Kerr vs Olga Stephens / Jacqueline Morgan6-2, 6-2
2022-08-29vs MGreenWon 10
W#3 DoublesJulia Kerr / Alison Uthe vs Tina McIntyre / Tori Schoen6-1, 6-2
2022-08-26vs CSmith/KoppLost 01
L#3 DoublesParker Wright / Lee Veit vs Anna Kouba / Melissa Graham7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2022-08-22vs ICconzola 18+ 6.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesParker Wright / Lee Veit vs Tassie McGannon / Lisa Fultz2-6, 3-6
2022-08-18vs JLiddleSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLee Veit / Amy Baker vs Takako Schenberger / Holly Eisenhour7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAlison Uthe / Libby Stubbs vs Shannon McNeill / Julie Liddle6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Alison Uthe
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.31
Lee Veit
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
3.22
Julie Coyne
published
3.19
Harriet Mills
published 3.5
3.11
Jillian Good
published
3.10
Julia Kerr
published
3.06
Parker Wright
published
3.04
Libby Stubbs
published
3.04
Amy Baker
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lee Veit + Alison Uthe3353% gamesnot enough data
Julie Coyne + Jillian Good123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alison Uthe
76W–61L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Lee Veit
83W–74L career · 11 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
Julie Coyne
4W–8L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Harriet Mills
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Jillian Good
7W–7L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.11
Julia Kerr
7W–11L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.10
Parker Wright
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.06
Libby Stubbs
5W–8L career · no lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.04
3
Amy Baker
12W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%39%61%
3.04

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.