Teams

2.5 Qualifying Team

2026 USTA Adult 18 & Over · Women 2.5 - 18 & Over

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / MONTANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-07-05vs Forty LoveLost 03
L#1 DoublesChristi Weber / Christine Foreman vs Devon Wickes / Sarah Webb0-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesKatie Finch vs Sonja Jacobson6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCaitlin Smith / Lindsey Hollern vs Heather Musselman / Valentina Perez-bradley0-6, 0-6
2026-07-04vs Forty LoveLost 02
L#1 DoublesErica Anderson / Anne Gage vs Heather Musselman / Sarah Webb1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesSusan Hayes vs Devon Wickes1-6, 1-6
2026-07-03vs Forty LoveLost 12
L#1 DoublesCaitlin Smith / Lindsey Hollern vs Devon Wickes / Sonja Jacobson0-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesKatie Finch vs Heather Musselman5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnne Gage / Amber Waters vs Sarah Webb / Valentina Perez-bradley0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · Women 2.5 - 18 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
12.5 Qualifying Team031817102

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Amber Waters
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Anne Gage
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Caitlin Smith
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Christi Weber
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Christine Foreman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Erica Anderson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Katie Finch
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Lindsey Hollern
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Susan Hayes
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Amber Waters
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Anne Gage
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Caitlin Smith
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Christi Weber
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Christine Foreman
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Erica Anderson
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Katie Finch
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lindsey Hollern
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Susan Hayes
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.