Teams

Alisal-Colts

2023 SCTA Doubles League - Santa Barbara · SB - Men Doubles - 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-11-19vs COAC-LIONSLost 01
L#1 DoublesVan Ribultan / Daniel Thompson vs Arin Reza / Slaven Tezak4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-11-12vs SB-LLW-SB/SMX-Joe LazaerLost 01
L#1 DoublesDaniel Thompson / STEPHEN JANES vs Jaime Garibay / Thomas Gonzales6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2023-10-29vs COAC-LIONSWon 10
W#1 DoublesKenneth Rotman / Daniel Thompson vs Melvin DeSilva / Keven Koski6-0, 6-4
2023-10-08vs COAC-LIONSLost 01
L#2 DoublesWalt Seemann / Daniel Thompson vs Slaven Tezak / Jason Marden4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SB - Men Doubles - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Daniel Thompson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.67
Ryan Chambers
published
3.58
Gordon Ewing
published
3.58
Walt Seemann
published
3.35
Michael Mantai
published
3.34
Randy Andell
published
Christopher Devaux
published
James Chambers
published
John Sawyer
published
Kenneth Rotman
published
Stephen Posthuma
published
Van Ribultan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Sawyer + Gordon Ewing404 matchesnot enough data
Van Ribultan + Stephen Posthuma123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Daniel Thompson
80W–50L career · 4 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.69
Ryan Chambers
19W–12L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.67
Gordon Ewing
15W–21L career · no lines in 2023
27%72%<1%
3.58
Walt Seemann
10W–12L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.58
Michael Mantai
36W–30L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%15%
3.35
Randy Andell
6W–19L career · no lines in 2023
88%12%<1%
3.34
Christopher Devaux
6W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
James Chambers
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
John Sawyer
6W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kenneth Rotman
4W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Stephen Posthuma
7W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Van Ribultan
6W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.