Teams

Wuz the Fuzz

2023 USTA ADULT 55 and OVER - BOISE · TV

9 players · average NTRP 4.17 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-28Lost 01
L#2 DoublesDavid Surbeck / Lance LaShelle vs Gary Sackett / Ken Coffey6-7, 1-6
2023-06-26vs Idaho/Buckingham/55&Over9.0MLost 01
L#2 DoublesDavid Surbeck / Lance LaShelle vs Mike Buckingham / Kimbell Gourley3-6, 2-6
2023-06-14vs Idaho/Buckingham/55&Over9.0MLost 02
L#1 DoublesJoseph Higgins / Lance LaShelle vs Mike Kirby / Bob Lopez2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKen Azbill / Ron Beck vs Mike Buckingham / Ken Coffey6-7, 2-6
2023-06-12vs Idaho/Buckingham/55&Over9.0MLost 02
L#1 DoublesChad Vincent / Ken Azbill vs Kimbell Gourley / Robb Warwick4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRon Beck / Lance LaShelle vs Mike Buckingham / Bob Lopez4-6, 2-6
2023-06-05Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKen Azbill / David Surbeck vs Gary Sackett / Steven Caven5-7, 4-6
2023-05-31vs Idaho/Buckingham/55&Over9.0MLost 01
L#3 DoublesKen Azbill / Joseph Higgins vs Mike Buckingham / Ken Coffey2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for TV have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.85 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

David Surbeck
published 4.5
3.98
Geoffrey Surbeck
published 4.5
3.98
Ron Kristensen
published 4
3.91
Ross Hoffman
published 4
3.81
Chad Vincent
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.55
Joseph Higgins
published 4
Ken Azbill
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Lance LaShelle
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Ron Beck
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joseph Higgins + Ross Hoffman7258% games−8.2% vs expected
Ron Kristensen + Chad Vincent2647% gamesnot enough data
David Surbeck + Geoffrey Surbeck3452% gamesnot enough data
Ken Azbill + Ron Kristensen224 matchesnot enough data
Ken Azbill + Lance LaShelle044 matchesnot enough data
Ken Azbill + Chad Vincent044 matchesnot enough data
Ron Beck + Geoffrey Surbeck404 matchesnot enough data
David Surbeck + Lance LaShelle044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
David Surbeck
37W–38L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Geoffrey Surbeck
26W–37L career · no lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
3.98
4
Ron Kristensen
65W–62L career · no lines in 2023
<1%55%45%
3.98
4
Ross Hoffman
130W–71L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Chad Vincent
49W–39L career · 8 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Joseph Higgins
91W–88L career · no lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.55
Ken Azbill
18W–43L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lance LaShelle
0W–9L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Ron Beck
5W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.