Teams

SS-LGT NAVY

2024 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.12 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-07-15vs KC-RH YELLOWSplit 22
L#1 DoublesNicole Poulos / Gabriela Cerny vs Stephanie Wilson / Lay Chan4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesJenni Poulos vs Erin Mason6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKaren Keehan Odendahl / Lindsey Sittko vs Sheryl Larsen / Mercedes Barrs4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesWendy Hynes / Kate Perreault vs Susan Pine / Sarah Bush6-3, 6-2
2024-07-08vs LEBTC NAVYLost 12
L#1 DoublesGabriela Cerny / Lesley Euston vs Emily Dreyer / Johanna Tiwari6-0, 6-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLindsey McGraw vs Luisa Dutzar4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCherie Mitchell / Karen Keehan Odendahl vs Amy Allmon / Megan Fry6-3, 6-2
2024-07-01vs GR NAVYWon 30
W#1 DoublesNicole Poulos / Tonya Berry vs Heather Killeen / Lauren Bloom1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLindsey McGraw / Lindsey Sittko vs Kelly Meilstrup / Tracey Felicidade Jones6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKaren Keehan Odendahl / Brooke Cannelongo vs Jacki Malone / Sabrina Pellerin6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2024-06-24vs BM BLUEWon 40
W#1 DoublesNicole Poulos / Tonya Berry vs Ashley Miller / Ari Nicholson6-3, 6-0
W#1 SinglesJenni Poulos vs Jennifer Moxon6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKate Perreault / Lindsey Sittko vs Amy Geist / Dawn Cominsky6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLesley Euston / Brooke Cannelongo vs Brenda Sears / Jane Carlson6-1, 6-0
2024-06-17vs KC-RH REDWon 31
L#1 DoublesAmy Noverr / Lindsey McGraw vs Allison Coquet / Cathy Welch2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJenni Poulos vs Alexis Rubin6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesGabriela Cerny / Lindsey Sittko vs Amy Murphy / Gina Merrill4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLesley Euston / Cherie Mitchell vs Robin Woelfel / Christi Hursta7-6, 1-6, 1-0
2024-06-10vs KC-RH YELLOWWon 31
W#1 DoublesGabriela Cerny / Tonya Berry vs Susan Pine / Sarah Bush6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLindsey McGraw vs Stephanie Wilson2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Noverr / Brooke Cannelongo vs Nichole Mairs / Erin Mason6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKaren Keehan Odendahl / Lesley Euston vs Ana Jansen / Mercedes Barrs5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2024-06-03vs LEBTC NAVYWon 31
W#1 DoublesTonya Berry / Brooke Cannelongo vs Amy Allmon / Johanna Tiwari6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesLindsey McGraw vs Leena Keshwani2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Noverr / Lindsey Sittko vs Emily Dreyer / Christianne Blevins6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCherie Mitchell / Lesley Euston vs Kara Edmiston Lavaux / Megan Fry6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Gabriela Cerny
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.10
Tonya Berry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Brooke Cannelongo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.02
Jenni Poulos
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.94
Lesley Euston
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.91
Lindsey McGraw
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.85
Nicole Poulos
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.84
Lindsey Sittko
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.83
Amy Noverr
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.75
Cherie Mitchell
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.70
Karen Keehan Odendahl
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.66
Kate Perreault
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Noverr + Kate Perreault6065% games+12.9% vs expected
Nicole Poulos + Tonya Berry9071% games+11.9% vs expected
Lindsey Sittko + Gabriela Cerny5069% games+11.1% vs expected
Gabriela Cerny + Kate Perreault9173% games+7.4% vs expected
Gabriela Cerny + Tonya Berry8362% games+6.3% vs expected
Cherie Mitchell + Karen Keehan Odendahl231756% games+4.3% vs expected
Nicole Poulos + Lindsey McGraw4259% games+1.9% vs expected
Amy Noverr + Lindsey Sittko18659% games+1.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Gabriela Cerny
72W–44L career · 4 lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
3.15
Tonya Berry
49W–22L career · 4 lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Brooke Cannelongo
54W–51L career · 4 lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.05
Jenni Poulos
24W–12L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%44%56%
3.02
3
Lesley Euston
57W–34L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
2.94
Lindsey McGraw
44W–30L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
2.91
3
Nicole Poulos
91W–55L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Lindsey Sittko
71W–33L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%89%10%
2.84
3
Amy Noverr
109W–49L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Cherie Mitchell
47W–35L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Karen Keehan Odendahl
76W–47L career · 4 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
2.70
Kate Perreault
40W–26L career · 2 lines in 2024
11%88%<1%
2.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.