Teams

Kr.Esham18S

2023 Cap 18 & Over Singles League · 2.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-31Lost 01
L#3 SinglesBrandy Vannoy vs Tricia Manger2-6, 1-6
2023-07-24Lost 01
L#2 SinglesKristin Esham vs Colleen Tapen4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-07-17Won 20
W#1 SinglesKristin Esham vs Barbara Williams6-4, 6-2
W#3 SinglesBrandy Vannoy vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-07-10vs La.McRee18SLost 02
L#1 SinglesKristin Esham vs Rossi Evans7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesBrandy Vannoy vs Samantha Hatem7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2023-06-28Won 10
W#2 SinglesKristin Esham vs Ashley Burch6-1, 6-2
2023-06-12Lost 01
L#3 SinglesBrandy Vannoy vs Kathleen Shore6-2, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.99
Kristin Esham
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #3 Singles 29% · published 3
2.89
Amy Cantando
published 3
2.82
Emily Best
published 3
2.79
Jocelyn Shaw
published
2.74
Karen Bornhofen
published
2.57
Jean Merta
published
2.27
Brandy Vannoy
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Cantando + Karen Bornhofen213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Kristin Esham
89W–69L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%52%48%
2.99
3
Amy Cantando
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Emily Best
10W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%9%
2.82
Jocelyn Shaw
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%5%
2.79
Karen Bornhofen
11W–7L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
2.74
Jean Merta
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
0%29%71%
2.57
2.5
Brandy Vannoy
21W–29L career · 4 lines in 2023
0%96%4%
2.27

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.