Teams

LCTA18/Elliget/I'On

STA 18 & Over Combo Doubles · 18 & Over Combo Men 9.5

12 players · average NTRP 4.64 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings5 teams · 18 & Over Combo Men 9.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LCTA18/Elliget/I'On601804107
2LCTA18/Greathouse/Maybank43111021178
3LCTA18/Cladakis/MPR3491225198
4LCTA18/Fortier-Bensen/LTPDI2451328187
5LCTA18/Sides/CTC0521328173

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.39 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.78
Adam Elliget
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 5
4.66
James T Elliget
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.46
Gregory Amerson
published 4.5
4.45
Walker Long
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
4.41
Erik Loesch
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.37
Zach Sperling
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.36
Doug MacKelcan
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
Grainger David
published 4.5
4.19
Mason Green
published
4.18
John Bumgarner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.07
Bo Crouch
published 4.5
Luke Kusmider
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mason Green + Erik Loesch5154% games+2.4% vs expected
John Bumgarner + Erik Loesch3252% gamesnot enough data
Erik Loesch + Doug MacKelcan5059% gamesnot enough data
Doug MacKelcan + James T Elliget3253% gamesnot enough data
Walker Long + Luke Kusmider303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Adam Elliget
23W–2L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
4.78
5
James T Elliget
21W–8L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
11%89%<1%
4.66
4.5
Gregory Amerson
5W–3L career · no lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
4.46
Walker Long
37W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
4.45
4.5
Erik Loesch
74W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
4.41
Zach Sperling
16W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
4.37
4.5
Doug MacKelcan
85W–44L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%86%13%
4.36
4.5
Grainger David
2W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Mason Green
7W–7L career · no lines in 2026
8%92%1%
4.19
John Bumgarner
27W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
8%91%1%
4.18
4.5
Bo Crouch
3W–4L career · no lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
4.07
Luke Kusmider
7W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.