Teams

Gosselin/Knoxville

2026 Adult 55 & Over-Knoxville · 4.0 Adult 55 & over Men

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-05-03vs Webster-Gaby/KnoxvilleWon 30
W#1 DoublesDaniel Messing / Travis Turley vs Matt Webster / James Serafin6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRob Gosselin / Peter Osucha vs Russ Gaby / Ron Allen6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTimmy Ramirez Cuesta / William Pearson vs Steve Atkins / Rob Lucas6-3, 6-4
2026-04-19vs Webster-Gaby/KnoxvilleWon 30
W#1 DoublesJeffrey Miller / Michael Dobrogosz vs Steve Atkins / Rob Lucas6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJohn Bui / Daniel Messing vs Matt Webster / James Serafin3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesWilliam Pearson / Travis Turley vs Ron Allen / Chip Criswell6-3, 6-0
2026-03-29vs Webster-Gaby/KnoxvilleWon 20
W#1 DoublesJohn Bui / Daniel Messing vs Chip Criswell / Russ Gaby6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesRob Gosselin / Michael Dobrogosz vs Rob Lucas / Matt Webster6-3, 6-2
2026-03-22vs Webster-Gaby/KnoxvilleWon 20
W#2 DoublesJohn Bui / Daniel Messing vs David Harano / Russ Gaby6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTodd Pearson / Christopher Aikens vs James Serafin / Steve Atkins6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2026-03-15vs Webster-Gaby/KnoxvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesJeffrey Miller / Travis Turley vs Matt Webster / Bryan Eaves4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesJeff Sullivan / Christopher Aikens vs Chip Criswell / Russ Gaby6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTimmy Ramirez Cuesta / Peter Osucha vs Rob Lucas / James Serafin3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 55 & over Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Travis Turley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.82
Michael Dobrogosz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.81
Daniel Messing
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.80
Christopher Aikens
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.80
Peter Osucha
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.76
Todd Pearson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.73
Rob Gosselin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Timmy Ramirez Cuesta
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Dobrogosz + Rob Gosselin4161% gamesnot enough data
Rob Gosselin + Todd Pearson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Travis Turley
11W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
3.86
Michael Dobrogosz
5W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
3.82
4
Daniel Messing
11W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
3.81
4
Christopher Aikens
18W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.80
Peter Osucha
22W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.80
Todd Pearson
12W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
3%93%4%
3.76
Rob Gosselin
21W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%2%
3.73
Timmy Ramirez Cuesta
13W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.