Teams

UPTA54/Bertling/Holly Tree

2024 Fall 54 & Over-Women-UPTA · 3.5 Women FF

16 players · average NTRP 3.38 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-11-27vs UPTA55FF/Hendricks/KrocLost 02
L#1 DoublesLisa Bertling / Jean Kleis vs Sarah Hendricks / Kathleen Ryan2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKimberly Bond / Bonnie Pittman vs Jill Wolf / Suzanne McGee5-7, 5-7
2024-11-13vs UPTA54/McCarthy/ReserveWon 30
W#1 DoublesJudith Lofurno / Cybil Nielsen vs Bobbi Nailor / Susan Boures6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesVickie Allen / Melanie Greene vs Sherry Morgan / Alleta McKeon6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKimberly Bond / Jeania Smith vs Kim Smentek / Mary O'Connell6-3, 6-1
2024-11-06vs Brookstone CookLost 12
L#1 DoublesJudith Lofurno / Bonnie Pittman vs Donetta Dodwell / Judith Morand6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJean Kleis / Jeania Smith vs Kristi King-Brock / Mary Jordan7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKathleen Fox / Michelle Weston vs Mary Cook / Doni Willmering6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2024-10-30vs Kroc/FF55AJohnsonWon 21
W#1 DoublesJean Kleis / Michelle Begin vs Missy Lawlor / Martha Gower6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJoan Close / Bonnie Pittman vs Stefanie Chase / Lisa Maurides4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKathleen Fox / Michelle Weston vs Anne Smith / Jane Trexler3-6, 4-6
2024-10-23vs Keowee Key SenioritasLost 12
L#1 DoublesBonnie Pittman / Jean Kleis vs Sandra Franklin / Peggy Braswell2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJoan Close / Kimberly Bond vs Mary Metzler / Catherine Twedt2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLisa Bertling / GLORIA ARMBRUSTER vs Katrina Prala / Shari Evans7-5, 6-3
2024-10-16vs UPTA55/Gruendling/CardinalWon 21
W#1 DoublesCybil Nielsen / Joan Close vs Denise Malone / Katherine Robinson6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJeania Smith / Melanie Greene vs Vicki Dixon / Judy Shaffer6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesLisa Bertling / GLORIA ARMBRUSTER vs Rebecca Gruendling / Dianne White2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women FF have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Catherine Erbacher
published 3.5
Cybil Nielsen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Jeania Smith
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.09
Bonnie Pittman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.07
Michelle Begin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Melanie Greene
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Kimberly Bond
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.97
Lisa Bertling
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.93
Michelle Weston
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Jean Kleis
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.85
Joan Close
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.81
Judith Lofurno
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
GLORIA ARMBRUSTER
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Vickie Allen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Bonita Clark
published 3
Jeannie Klas
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joan Close + Jean Kleis5455% games+8.6% vs expected
Jean Kleis + Michelle Begin2346% games−2.3% vs expected
Kimberly Bond + Joan Close1640% games−6.4% vs expected
Vickie Allen + Michelle Weston2444% gamesnot enough data
Michelle Weston + Jeania Smith224 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Weston + Michelle Begin404 matchesnot enough data
Joan Close + Lisa Bertling134 matchesnot enough data
Bonnie Pittman + Judith Lofurno123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Catherine Erbacher
1W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Cybil Nielsen
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jeania Smith
12W–19L career · 3 lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Bonnie Pittman
10W–11L career · 4 lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.09
Michelle Begin
27W–25L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%31%69%
3.07
Melanie Greene
14W–30L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%42%58%
3.03
Kimberly Bond
16W–18L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%57%43%
2.98
Lisa Bertling
14W–16L career · 3 lines in 2024
58%42%<1%
2.97
Michelle Weston
22W–23L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
2.93
Jean Kleis
28W–41L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
2.87
Joan Close
19W–40L career · 3 lines in 2024
87%13%<1%
2.85
Judith Lofurno
9W–19L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.81
GLORIA ARMBRUSTER
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.79
Vickie Allen
10W–11L career · 1 line in 2024
3%93%4%
2.75
3
Bonita Clark
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jeannie Klas
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.