Teams

CCV-Atiyeh

2022 Richmond Mixed 18 & Over Winter · Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 8.0

15 players · average NTRP 4.30 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-03-12vs RAIN-FallinLost 01
L#2 DoublesWesley Atiyeh / Melissa Mauck vs Teresa Lancaster / Mahesh Sukumaran3-6, 3-6
2022-02-19vs MAC-SnowSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLeemore Burke / Clark Halladay vs Yong Ko / Susan Greenspoon6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMelissa Mauck / Matthew Wherry vs Matthew Morris / Denise Terrell2-6, 2-6
2022-02-12vs SAL-FranksWon 10
W#2 DoublesMelissa Mauck / Wesley Atiyeh vs Megan Shrestha / Richard Lloyd2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-02-06vs ACAC-SipeLost 02
L#1 DoublesClark Halladay / Leemore Burke vs Scott Kim / Molly Iracane7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMatthew Wherry / Melissa Mauck vs Sung Kang / Valerie Stephens3-6, 3-6
2022-01-22vs HERM-ShrinerWon 10
W#2 DoublesClark Halladay / Leemore Burke vs Pam Walsh / Steve Hamant6-4, 6-0
2022-01-15Won 10
W#2 DoublesMatthew Wherry / Leemore Burke vs Byron Roberts / Kristi King6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2022-01-09vs WW-WaylandLost 01
L#2 DoublesWesley Atiyeh / Leemore Burke vs William Pilc / Linda Jimenez0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
Clark Halladay
published 4.5
Alice Cooper
published 4.5
4.22
Genevieve Alley
published 4.5
4.10
Katherine Mueller
published
3.73
Karen Williamson
published
3.68
Laurel Wise
published
3.65
Joseph Parker
published
3.64
Alison Avery
published 4
3.64
Matthew Wherry
published
3.64
Russell Moore
published
3.61
Leemore Burke
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.54
Tom Cricchi
published
3.42
Melissa Mauck
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Randy Williamson
published
Susan Trigg
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Clark Halladay
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
4.30
4.5
Alice Cooper
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Genevieve Alley
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
4.22
Katherine Mueller
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
4.10
Karen Williamson
7W–6L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
Laurel Wise
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
Joseph Parker
11W–4L career · no lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.65
4
Alison Avery
16W–13L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.64
Matthew Wherry
3W–8L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.64
Russell Moore
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.64
4
Leemore Burke
54W–67L career · 5 lines in 2022
19%80%<1%
3.61
Tom Cricchi
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.54
Melissa Mauck
69W–76L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.42
Randy Williamson
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Susan Trigg
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.