Teams

MTC 8.0 Downing

2025 Richmond Adult 55 & Over Weeknight Women · Richmond Adult 55 & Over Weeknight 8.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-18vs Burkwood-KampingaWon 10
W#2 DoublesCindy Eramian / Joy Lareau vs Robin Tyler / Kathy Denunzio6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2025-08-11vs ACAC Stallard/GiancasproWon 10
W#2 DoublesJoy Lareau / Cindy Eramian vs Lee Moore / Jane Riddle7-5, 6-3
2025-08-04vs Hermitage WalshLost 01
L#2 DoublesJoy Lareau / Patricia Thagard vs Pam Walsh / Jane Kauder4-6, 2-4
2025-07-28vs Belmont - Colgin 55+ WeeknightWon 10
W#1 DoublesKaren Budlong / Joy Lareau vs Patricia Riester / Anne Murray6-3, 6-4
2025-07-21vs CCV BartzenWon 10
W#1 DoublesCindy Eramian / Joy Lareau vs Lorraine Hackney / Elizabeth Martin6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-07-14vs Burkwood-KampingaSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJoy Lareau / Cindy Eramian vs Katherine Carnohan / Amy Holmes3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesRobin Meyer / Janice McGarity vs Kimberley Winn / Lisa Adkins6-2, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 55 & Over Weeknight 8.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Janice McGarity
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.83
Nancy Pitts
published
3.78
Joy Lareau
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.78
Cindy Eramian
published 4
Hanna Mogilnicka
published 4
3.55
Diana Duddy
published 4
3.34
Laurie Miller
published
3.17
Erin Euen
published 3.5
3.12
Robin Meyer
published
Karen Budlong
published
Marilyn Downing
published
Maureen McGrath
published
Susan Nothnagle
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joy Lareau + Nancy Pitts9164% games−2.2% vs expected
Maureen McGrath + Cindy Eramian5060% gamesnot enough data
Erin Euen + Robin Meyer033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Janice McGarity
70W–56L career · 1 line in 2025
61%39%<1%
3.96
Nancy Pitts
15W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Joy Lareau
85W–99L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Cindy Eramian
7W–3L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Hanna Mogilnicka
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Diana Duddy
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.55
Laurie Miller
2W–9L career · no lines in 2025
89%11%<1%
3.34
3.5
Erin Euen
2W–9L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.17
Robin Meyer
15W–23L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.12
Karen Budlong
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Marilyn Downing
1W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Maureen McGrath
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Nothnagle
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.