Teams

LTFCS PLUMMER

2021 TRIO - SOCO · WOMEN 4.0 - TRIO - SOCO

9 players · average NTRP 3.67 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2021-04-17vs LTFCS KALTENBACHERLost 02
L#1 DoublesCarrie Ingersoll / Sara Michon vs Chantel Rosario / Shinobu Voss2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTerri Plummer / Tami Hulsey vs Salome D'Silva / Joan Nachbar7-6, 6-7, 0-1
2021-04-03vs MEMPK MCCARRONWon 20
W#1 DoublesCharlie Bishop / Terri Plummer vs Susan Hippe / Stefanie McCarron7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCarrie Ingersoll / Sara Michon vs Kayla Breedlove / Cheryl Gorthy6-1, 6-1
2021-03-20vs PBTC HENSONSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTerri Plummer / Anne Ryals vs Alyssa Parga / Paula Henson6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesValerie Aldanese / Sara Michon vs Christine Brown / Jeannette Ortiz6-1, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - TRIO - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Carrie Ingersoll
published 4
Charlie Bishop
published 4
3.46
Sara Michon
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.38
Tatiana Merkoulova
published
3.38
Terri Plummer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Anne Ryals
published 3.5
2.97
Vicki Gess
published 3
Kimberly Peterson
published
Tami Hulsey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Terri Plummer + Charlie Bishop101045% games−10.7% vs expected
Terri Plummer + Kimberly Peterson4254% gamesnot enough data
Vicki Gess + Terri Plummer213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carrie Ingersoll
7W–11L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Charlie Bishop
23W–25L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Sara Michon
83W–94L career · 3 lines in 2021
63%37%<1%
3.46
Tatiana Merkoulova
17W–33L career · no lines in 2021
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Terri Plummer
57W–80L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Anne Ryals
24W–19L career · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.21
3
Vicki Gess
54W–58L career · no lines in 2021
<1%58%42%
2.97
Kimberly Peterson
5W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Tami Hulsey
3W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.