Teams

Sander/Fayetteville/SRC

2024 Adult Singles 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.75 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-01-31vs Cooper/Fayetteville/FACLost 12
L#1 SinglesAnnie Frail vs Jena Newman0-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesJeanne Rath vs Misti Lira5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 SinglesCaroline Sander vs Aysa Galbraith3-6, 1-6
2024-12-10vs Mitchell/PG/FACWon 30
W#1 SinglesKristen Rolle vs Elizabeth Mitchell6-4, 6-3
W#2 SinglesLacey Baker vs Rachel Cockrell6-0, 6-2
W#3 SinglesAnnie Frail vs Tania Brewer6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.33 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.65
Caroline Sander
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.53
Kristen Rolle
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.40
Jeanne Rath
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.12
Linzay Feilke
published
1.94
Annie Frail
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 2.5
Lacey Baker
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
Micayla Hendricks
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristen Rolle + Jeanne Rath224 matchesnot enough data
Caroline Sander + Lacey Baker303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Caroline Sander
12W–14L career · 1 line in 2024
13%86%<1%
2.65
Kristen Rolle
18W–20L career · 1 line in 2024
41%59%<1%
2.53
Jeanne Rath
9W–16L career · 1 line in 2024
78%22%<1%
2.40
Linzay Feilke
8W–13L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.12
2.5
Annie Frail
3W–21L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
1.94
Lacey Baker
7W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Micayla Hendricks
3W–18L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.