Teams

Carrollwood Slice Girls - L. Atkinson

2021 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over Day- Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-03-22vs Cheval - B. BurdetteWon 20
W#2 DoublesShelley Weathers / Sabine Wahl vs Caroline Faifman / Brenda Burdette6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLisa Polk / Andrea Cottrell vs Robin Perrone / Jacqueline Hayes7-6, 6-1
2021-03-12vs Hills - FH Sweetspots/C. DemingWon 10
W#3 DoublesSabine Wahl / Shelley Weathers vs Monica Eiermann / Susan MOSHER7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesShelley Weathers / Sabine Wahl vs Tyra Hunt / Carly Day6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLisa Polk / Andrea Cottrell vs Cynthia Scaletta / Christy Clinard6-3, 6-0
2021-02-15vs FH Moodswings - C. GuidoWon 10
W#3 DoublesSabine Wahl / Shelley Weathers vs Wendy Dobreff / Jen O'Leary7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSabine Wahl / Shelley Weathers vs Melissa Kandell / Amy Butts6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLisa Polk / Andrea Cottrell vs Jolanta Lagowski / Kay Peterson6-2, 6-2
2021-01-11Won 10
W#3 DoublesSabine Wahl / Shelley Weathers vs Katie Johnson / Jennifer Harrell2-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over Day- Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.37
Angie Jones
published 4.5
3.42
Andrea Cottrell
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.35
Caroline Duprot
published 3.5
3.32
Kathryn Stallings
published
3.29
Lisa Polk
published
3.28
Shelley Weathers
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Lydia Atkinson
published
2.97
Giliane Rifai
published 3
2.92
Gina Lund
published 3
2.53
Melanie Baum
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shelley Weathers + Andrea Cottrell5259% gamesnot enough data
Caroline Duprot + Lydia Atkinson314 matchesnot enough data
Andrea Cottrell + Lisa Polk404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Angie Jones
11W–7L career · no lines in 2021
<1%84%15%
4.37
3.5
Andrea Cottrell
100W–33L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Caroline Duprot
5W–3L career · no lines in 2021
<1%87%12%
3.35
Kathryn Stallings
7W–4L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.32
Lisa Polk
8W–7L career · no lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Shelley Weathers
89W–49L career · 6 lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.28
Lydia Atkinson
4W–2L career · no lines in 2021
9%91%1%
3.18
3
Giliane Rifai
20W–5L career · no lines in 2021
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Gina Lund
15W–9L career · no lines in 2021
<1%72%28%
2.92
Melanie Baum
0W–5L career · no lines in 2021
42%58%<1%
2.53

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.