Teams

Who gives a shot

Spring Adult 18 & Over WeekEND · Ladies 4.5 18s

16 players · average NTRP 4.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-11-06vs Incredibelles 18+Lost 02
L#1 DoublesStephanie Rodriguez / Julie Petrucelli vs Marisa Druss / Janet Rice4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAlly Sivewright / Matilda O'Connor vs Clarissa McWilliams / Julie Dolezal4-6, 3-6
2022-10-30vs Topspin 4.5Lost 13
L#1 DoublesJennifer Nguyen / Sarah Atkinson vs Sharon McKinney / Lauren Lombardo3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesKimberly Rowe vs MacIe Morris6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTiffany Muller / Julie Petrucelli vs Haruna Miyakado / Priscilla Garza1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMariaan Badenhorst / Natasha Baker vs Holly Casero / Stephanie Berry6-1, 6-0
2022-10-24vs Incredibelles 18+Split 22
L#1 DoublesMariaan Badenhorst / Natasha Baker vs Christine Jensen / Julie Dolezal4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesKimberly Rowe vs Maria Orrick7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLezli Harrell / Keri Backus vs Beth Utley / Clarissa McWilliams5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAlly Sivewright / Jennifer Duke vs Gay Myrick / Amy Sullivan6-3, 6-2
2022-10-09vs Incredibelles 18+Split 22
W#1 DoublesMariaan Badenhorst / Ally Sivewright vs Jane Flynn / Catalina Randall4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJennifer Duke vs Marisa Druss2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesTiffany Muller / Linda Haddox vs Gayle Kirkpatrick / Janet Rice3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJulie Petrucelli / Christina Vogdes vs Clarissa McWilliams / Beth Utley6-4, 6-3
2022-09-11vs Topspin 4.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesColette Bellville / Sarah Atkinson vs Haruna Miyakado / Lauren Lombardo0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesChristina Vogdes / Julie Petrucelli vs Davonne Lewis / Savannah Bryson1-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ladies 4.5 18s have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.97 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.46
Natasha Baker
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.30
Heidi Shelton
published 4.5
4.16
Christina Vogdes
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.13
Mariaan Badenhorst
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.12
Ally Sivewright
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.06
Colette Bellville
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.04
Julie Petrucelli
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.02
Kimberly Rowe
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.83
Linda Haddox
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.66
Matilda O'Connor
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Sarah Atkinson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Jennifer Duke
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Lezli Harrell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Michelle Graham
published
Stephanie Rodriguez
published
Tiffany Muller
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christina Vogdes + Julie Petrucelli443551% games+2.6% vs expected
Sarah Atkinson + Tiffany Muller1539% games+0.4% vs expected
Colette Bellville + Natasha Baker2447% games−4.7% vs expected
Mariaan Badenhorst + Natasha Baker4168% gamesnot enough data
Heidi Shelton + Mariaan Badenhorst224 matchesnot enough data
Heidi Shelton + Stephanie Rodriguez314 matchesnot enough data
Stephanie Rodriguez + Kimberly Rowe134 matchesnot enough data
Colette Bellville + Mariaan Badenhorst123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Natasha Baker
20W–13L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
4.46
4.5
Heidi Shelton
73W–50L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
4.30
4.5
Christina Vogdes
59W–48L career · 2 lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
4.16
Mariaan Badenhorst
26W–17L career · 3 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
4.13
4.5
Ally Sivewright
37W–20L career · 3 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
4.12
4.5
Colette Bellville
30W–46L career · 1 line in 2022
31%69%<1%
4.06
Julie Petrucelli
52W–50L career · 4 lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
4.04
Kimberly Rowe
20W–21L career · 2 lines in 2022
43%57%<1%
4.02
Linda Haddox
43W–22L career · 1 line in 2022
1%90%9%
3.83
Matilda O'Connor
37W–28L career · 1 line in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.66
Sarah Atkinson
32W–58L career · 2 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.63
Jennifer Duke
55W–45L career · 2 lines in 2022
98%2%<1%
3.23
Lezli Harrell
12W–31L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Michelle Graham
15W–16L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Stephanie Rodriguez
45W–41L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tiffany Muller
41W–46L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.