Teams

USTA-Naumenko

2026 ORANGESEMINOLE Combo 18 & Over-Summer Day · 5.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_4

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-08-07vs Isleworth-CastanoWon 20
W#1 DoublesAshley Johnson Layrisse / Maria Luisa Davila vs Susan Goetz / Shelby Mannella6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKelli Alexander / Yana Krylova vs Kristie Mansilla / Allisha Neal6-2, 6-2
2026-07-31vs Isleworth-CastanoWon 30
W#1 DoublesLana Lyubimova / Yana Krylova vs Meghan Mannella / Patricia Castano6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesNalini Karamchandani / Mary Wilson vs Allison Bolanovich / Sara Kumar6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJenna Johns / Yoliber Lopez vs Susan Goetz / Allisha Neal6-2, 6-3
2026-07-24vs Isleworth-CastanoWon 21
W#1 DoublesKiera Phoebus / Nalini Karamchandani vs Kyle DiGiannantonio / Patricia Castano7-6, 6-0
L#2 DoublesYoliber Lopez / Kelli Alexander vs Allison Bolanovich / Sara Kumar3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMary Wilson / Julia Elliott vs Kristie Mansilla / Nicole Ryan6-1, 6-0
2026-07-18vs Isleworth-CastanoWon 30
W#1 DoublesPatty Villane / Ashley Johnson Layrisse vs MATIJANA ROSS / Jenna Moseley6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJenna Johns / Maria Luisa Davila vs Adriana Rojas / Sara Kumar6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAlexa McCulley / Fabiana Cortez vs Bridget Burris / Allisha Neal7-5, 6-3
2026-07-10vs Isleworth-CastanoWon 21
W#1 DoublesLana Lyubimova / Fabiana Cortez vs Bridget Burris / Shelby Mannella6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKiera Phoebus / Yana Krylova vs Adriana Rojas / Sara Kumar4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesPatty Villane / Alexa McCulley vs Anita Ankola / Susan Goetz6-2, 6-1
2026-07-03vs Isleworth-CastanoWon 21
W#1 DoublesCarolyn Ferngren / Patty Villane vs Noelle Siegel / Kristie Mansilla6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesFabiana Cortez / Marcela Bernardinez vs Jenna Moseley / MATIJANA ROSS6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesElly Phoebus / Yoliber Lopez vs Bridget Burris / Allisha Neal6-7, 0-6
2026-06-26vs Isleworth-CastanoWon 30
W#1 DoublesMarcela Bernardinez / Maria Luisa Davila vs Noelle Siegel / Patricia Castano6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesValentina Naumenko / Fabiana Cortez vs Meghan Mannella / Nicole Ryan6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesPatty Villane / Carolyn Ferngren vs Kyle DiGiannantonio / Anita Ankola6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 5.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1USTA-Naumenko701836105
2Isleworth-Castano0731836234

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Mary Wilson
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.20
Kiera Phoebus
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.09
Valentina Naumenko
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.98
Ashley Johnson Layrisse
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.96
Jenna Johns
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.94
Lana Lyubimova
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.92
Patty Villane
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.87
Alexa McCulley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.87
Marcela Bernardinez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.81
Fabiana Cortez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.79
Kelli Alexander
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Elly Phoebus
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Julia Elliott
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Nalini Karamchandani
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elly Phoebus + Kiera Phoebus7756% gamesnot enough data
Valentina Naumenko + Lana Lyubimova404 matchesnot enough data
Mary Wilson + Kiera Phoebus303 matchesnot enough data
Kelli Alexander + Kiera Phoebus303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Wilson
22W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.43
3
Kiera Phoebus
70W–36L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%7%93%
3.20
Valentina Naumenko
26W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%26%74%
3.09
3
Ashley Johnson Layrisse
76W–55L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
2.98
Jenna Johns
24W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
2.96
Lana Lyubimova
21W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
2.94
Patty Villane
5W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%71%28%
2.92
3
Alexa McCulley
8W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
2.87
Marcela Bernardinez
10W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
2.87
Fabiana Cortez
9W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
Kelli Alexander
10W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Elly Phoebus
77W–104L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
2.78
Julia Elliott
4W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Nalini Karamchandani
2W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.