Teams

"Jus' Smash 'um"

2022 Adult 40 and Over League · 3.5 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / EAST HAWAII

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-03-06vs Kauka ExpressLost 13
L#1 DoublesDale Hayashi / Glenn Tada vs Nate Riedel / Thomas Belcher5-7, 1-6
W#1 SinglesHaddon Wong Yuen vs Michael Marshall6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesWarren Sako / Glenn Sumida vs Lance Sewake / Jon Tokuuke3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJoseph Borer / Ken Kuwahara vs Nolan Yamaki / Dave Okamura6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2022-02-19vs Kauka ExpressWon 40
W#1 DoublesDale Hayashi / Glenn Tada vs Troy Hill / Lance Kaneshiro6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesHaddon Wong Yuen vs Michael Marshall7-6, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJoseph Borer / Ken Kuwahara vs Jon Tokuuke / J Yoshimoto6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTed Hong / Andy Narido Sr vs Brian Koge / Kelvin Nishiura6-3, 6-4
2022-02-06vs Kauka ExpressSplit 22
W#1 DoublesKen Kuwahara / Warren Sako vs Troy Hill / Jon Tokuuke2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTed Hong vs Lance Kaneshiro3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesGlenn Tada / Glenn Sumida vs Nate Riedel / Brian Koge6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAndy Narido Sr / Lester Oshiro vs J Yoshimoto / Nolan Yamaki2-6, 3-6
2022-01-29vs Kauka ExpressWon 31
W#1 DoublesDale Hayashi / Glenn Tada vs Thomas Belcher / Lance Kaneshiro6-3, 7-6
W#1 SinglesHaddon Wong Yuen vs Lance Sewake1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKen Kuwahara / Warren Sako vs Nolan Yamaki / Michael Marshall5-7, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDennis Wulff / Andy Narido Sr vs Kelvin Nishiura / Dave Okamura3-6, 3-6
2022-01-16vs Kauka ExpressLost 13
L#1 DoublesWarren Sako / Dale Hayashi vs Lance Sewake / Nate Riedel1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesTed Hong vs Nolan Yamaki6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDennis Wulff / Joseph Borer vs Troy Hill / Lance Kaneshiro2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBrian DeLima / Lester Oshiro vs Dave Okamura / Brian Koge6-7, 5-7
2022-01-09vs Kauka ExpressLost 13
L#1 DoublesTed Hong / Ken Kuwahara vs Lance Sewake / Jon Tokuuke3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesWarren Sako vs Michael Marshall6-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesGlenn Tada / Dale Hayashi vs Troy Hill / J Yoshimoto6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDennis Wulff / Mark Chun vs Nate Riedel / Thomas Belcher3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1"Jus' Smash 'um"24121229233

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Glenn Tada
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.29
Mark Chun
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Dennis Wulff
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Lester Oshiro
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.03
Warren Sako
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.99
Ted Hong
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.87
Dale Hayashi
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Andy Narido Sr
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Brian DeLima
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Glenn Sumida
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Haddon Wong Yuen
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Joseph Borer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Ken Kuwahara
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dale Hayashi + Glenn Tada6262% games+10.3% vs expected
Lester Oshiro + Ted Hong3438% games−5.6% vs expected
Warren Sako + Ken Kuwahara5153% gamesnot enough data
Mark Chun + Glenn Tada5076% gamesnot enough data
Warren Sako + Lester Oshiro2349% gamesnot enough data
Warren Sako + Dale Hayashi2343% gamesnot enough data
Lester Oshiro + Dale Hayashi3255% gamesnot enough data
Mark Chun + Dennis Wulff213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Glenn Tada
96W–60L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.39
Mark Chun
48W–20L career · 1 line in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Dennis Wulff
19W–7L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Lester Oshiro
64W–123L career · 2 lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Warren Sako
34W–71L career · 5 lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.03
Ted Hong
38W–84L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%54%46%
2.99
3.5
Dale Hayashi
33W–36L career · 5 lines in 2022
84%16%<1%
2.87
Andy Narido Sr
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Brian DeLima
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Glenn Sumida
13W–9L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Haddon Wong Yuen
40W–11L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Joseph Borer
30W–18L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Ken Kuwahara
6W–3L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.