Teams

Hagood40+3.0/META

2025 Adult 40 & Over-META · 3.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-18vs Cowart-Janiszewski/METALost 13
W#1 DoublesJu Mo / Kari Holt vs Barb Janiszewski / Regan Jordan7-5, 6-2
L#1 SinglesMargaret Wells vs Kelly Kattesh3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAnita Jilton / Joan Hagood vs Madga Cox / Tiffany Scardo6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPamela Prince-Eason / Gabriela Stai vs Jan Goodsell / Sherri Johnston1-6, 5-7
2025-05-14vs Cowart-Janiszewski/METAWon 21
L#1 DoublesMargaret Wells / Cindy Young vs Madga Cox / Barb Janiszewski2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesKari Holt vs Rachel Lovelace2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnita Jilton / Joan Hagood vs Linda Cowart / Jan Goodsell6-0, 6-1
2025-05-04vs Cowart-Janiszewski/METALost 03
L#1 DoublesJoan Hagood / Ju Mo vs Jane Dean / Lynne Little3-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesMakie Kordamiri vs Tiffany Scardo2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPamela Prince-Eason / Anita Jilton vs Madga Cox / Kelly Kattesh3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-04-27vs Cowart-Janiszewski/METALost 13
L#1 DoublesKeo Jur / Joan Hagood vs Lynne Little / Sherri Johnston4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesMakie Kordamiri vs Kirsten Hoskins1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAnneke Self / Anita Jilton vs Rachel Lovelace / Tiffany Scardo4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMargaret Wells / Cindy Young vs Barb Janiszewski / Kim Cartier7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2025-04-13vs Cowart-Janiszewski/METALost 13
L#1 DoublesAnita Jilton / Pamela Prince-Eason vs Jane Dean / Regan Jordan2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMargaret Wells vs Kirsten Hoskins0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJoan Hagood / Keo Jur vs Rachel Lovelace / Ashley Youngblood6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAnneke Self / Makie Kordamiri vs Jan Goodsell / Sherri Johnston0-6, 1-6
2025-04-02vs Cowart-Janiszewski/METASplit 22
W#1 DoublesKeo Jur / Anneke Self vs Rachel Lovelace / Ashley Youngblood6-2, 6-0
L#1 SinglesKari Holt vs Madga Cox1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJoan Hagood / Anita Jilton vs Regan Jordan / Tiffany Scardo1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMakie Kordamiri / Margaret Wells vs Kim Cartier / Barb Janiszewski6-2, 0-6, 0-1
2025-03-23vs Cowart-Janiszewski/METALost 13
L#1 DoublesMakie Kordamiri / Lisa Peterson vs Lynne Little / Jane Dean3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMargaret Wells vs Kirsten Hoskins1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAnita Jilton / Kari Holt vs Regan Jordan / Kelly Kattesh6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJoan Hagood / Keo Jur vs Rachel Lovelace / Ashley Youngblood3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Ju Mo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Anita Jilton
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.96
Keo Jur
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.92
Makie Kordamiri
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
2.78
Anneke Self
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.70
Kari Holt
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.58
Joan Hagood
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
2.48
Margaret Wells
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Gabriela Stai
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Pamela Prince-Eason
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joan Hagood + Anita Jilton2444% games−2.3% vs expected
Joan Hagood + Keo Jur123 matchesnot enough data
Anita Jilton + Ju Mo303 matchesnot enough data
Anita Jilton + Keo Jur213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ju Mo
24W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%9%91%
3.19
3
Anita Jilton
33W–16L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.10
Keo Jur
10W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
2.96
Makie Kordamiri
11W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Anneke Self
8W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
2.78
Kari Holt
13W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
2.70
Joan Hagood
6W–18L career · 7 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
2.58
Margaret Wells
4W–15L career · 6 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.48
Gabriela Stai
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Pamela Prince-Eason
0W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.