Teams

WI Mixed Tri-Level Delta Fall_Jenn

2024 WI Adult Tri-Level · WI Mixed Tri-Level Delta Fall

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-10-27Split 11
L#1 DoublesGreg Schibbelhut / Bette Smith vs C H / Kaitlin Grey5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesTim Wisinski / Jennifer Carr vs Michael Ojelabi / Nancy Winberg6-7, 6-0, 1-0
2024-10-20Won 20
W#1 DoublesBette Smith / Greg Schibbelhut vs Jeffree Herde / Ellen Seithamer6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJennifer Carr / Tim Wisinski vs Regina Jones / Dan Grilley6-1, 6-3
2024-10-13Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJennifer Carr / Greg Schibbelhut vs Anna Daun / Tung Ouy4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesBette Smith / Tim Wisinski vs Tyler Thomas / Kacey Nomland3-6, 2-6
2024-10-06Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer Carr / Tim Wisinski vs Kaitlin Grey / C H4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-09-29Won 10
W#1 DoublesGreg Schibbelhut / Bette Smith vs Jeffree Herde / Ellen Seithamer7-5, 6-4
2024-09-22Lost 03
L#1 DoublesGreg Schibbelhut / Bette Smith vs Tung Ouy / Anna Daun6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Carr / Tim Wisinski vs Susan Anderson / Elia Romano3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJudith Engen / Keith Engen vs Michelle Rank / Tyler Thomas0-6, 1-6
2024-09-15Split 11
L#1 DoublesJudith Engen / Keith Engen vs Jerver de Leon / Nancy Winberg2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesJennifer Carr / Greg Schibbelhut vs Shanon Torgerud / C H4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-09-08Won 20
W#1 DoublesBette Smith / Greg Schibbelhut vs Ellen Seithamer / Jeffree Herde6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Carr / Tim Wisinski vs Regina Jones / Andrew Seithamer6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WI Mixed Tri-Level Delta Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Bette Smith
usually #2 Doubles 62%, also #1 Doubles 39% · published 3.5
Greg Schibbelhut
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
Hannah Exner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jennifer Carr
usually #2 Doubles 69%, also #1 Doubles 23% · published
Judith Engen
usually #3 Doubles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published
Keith Engen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Tim Wisinski
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bette Smith + Greg Schibbelhut3254% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Carr + Tim Wisinski3260% gamesnot enough data
Judith Engen + Keith Engen044 matchesnot enough data
Judith Engen + Hannah Exner404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bette Smith
21W–16L career · 13 lines in 2024
not enough data
Greg Schibbelhut
16W–19L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Hannah Exner
21W–24L career · 13 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jennifer Carr
13W–4L career · 13 lines in 2024
not enough data
Judith Engen
26W–21L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Keith Engen
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tim Wisinski
7W–4L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.