Teams

IE-McDermott Park-West

2025 SCTA Tri-Level 18 & Over - IE · IE Men 4.5

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-09-20vs IE-Elevenis-BolandLost 01
L#1 DoublesEVAN CHANG / Daniel Gonzalez vs Vincent Nguyen / Justin Harper5-7, 2-6
2025-09-13vs IE-LLW-TCC-CardonaWon 10
W#1 DoublesEVAN CHANG / Maki Potes vs Jeff Bivens / Bryan Dodd0-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-09-06vs IE-EagleGlen/Kellogg-ChonLost 01
L#3 DoublesEVAN CHANG / Simon Nguyen vs Norman Kung / Ryan Tran4-6, 2-6
2025-08-23vs IE-Canyon Lake-HansenLost 01
L#1 DoublesEVAN CHANG / Daniel Gonzalez vs Phillip Braun / Brett Marymee6-7, 3-6
2025-08-16vs IE-Elevenis-BolandLost 01
L#1 DoublesEVAN CHANG / Richard Layon vs Vincent Nguyen / Yu-Jen Lin6-7, 2-6
2025-08-10vs IE-LLW-TCC-CardonaLost 01
L#1 DoublesEVAN CHANG / Maki Potes vs Jeff Bivens / David Weisman3-6, 3-6
2025-08-02vs IE-EagleGlen/Kellogg-ChonLost 01
L#1 DoublesEVAN CHANG / Richard Layon vs Ryan Tran / Norman Kung2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for IE Men 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.23
Richard Layon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.18
Maki Potes
published
3.94
EVAN CHANG
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 4.5
3.82
Simon Nguyen
published
3.74
Aaron Ramos
published 3.5
3.67
Wayne West
published
3.65
Gustavo Olmos
published
3.60
Chris Alvarez
published 4
3.49
Robbie Muyargas
published
3.42
Ehab Ateia
published
3.31
Darrell Millsap
published 3.5
3.31
Rony Monterroso
published
3.21
Yijun Zhang
published
Ethan Perkins
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Richard Layon + EVAN CHANG2343% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Richard Layon
61W–45L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
4.23
Maki Potes
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
4.18
4.5
EVAN CHANG
97W–139L career · 7 lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
3.94
Simon Nguyen
15W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.82
3.5
Aaron Ramos
12W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%4%96%
3.74
Wayne West
8W–11L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Gustavo Olmos
3W–13L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.65
4
Chris Alvarez
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
Robbie Muyargas
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.49
Ehab Ateia
12W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Darrell Millsap
24W–28L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Rony Monterroso
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Yijun Zhang
11W–23L career · no lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.21
Ethan Perkins
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.