Teams

2-RMcGarrah-HR

2024 Eno River Combo 40 & Over · 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Men Evening

12 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-10-08vs 4-ROakley-EVWon 10
W#1 DoublesAndrew Curso / Rodney Matthews vs Noel Miquiabas / Aaron Young7-5, 6-1
2024-10-01vs 6-JRussell-DFCWon 10
W#2 DoublesRob McGarrah / Mark Fossum vs Adam Rust / Jeff Russell6-2, 6-4
2024-09-24vs 3-PHariharan-ENOWon 10
W#1 DoublesAndrew Curso / Robert Hutchins vs Mark Spining / Ram Basireddy6-1, 6-4
2024-09-10vs 1-MBland-CHTCLost 01
L#3 DoublesAndrew Curso / Ashraf Habib vs Stephen Ryan / Bill Stewart5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2024-08-27vs 6-JRussell-DFCWon 20
W#2 DoublesTom Petersen / Rob McGarrah vs Matthew Sears / Bruce Elvin7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAndrew Curso / Ashraf Habib vs Daniel Ennis / Christopher Monroe6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2024-08-20vs 3-PHariharan-ENOLost 01
L#3 DoublesAndrew Curso / John Harlow vs Nitni Agrawal / Melwyn Joachim0-6, 4-6
2024-08-19vs 1-MBland-CHTCSplit 11
L#2 DoublesRob McGarrah / George Corbett vs Andres Pineda / David Ward1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMatt Williamson / Andrew Curso vs Gary Glish / Bill Stewart4-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Robert Hutchins
published
3.26
Andrew Curso
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Tom Petersen
published
3.09
Mark Fossum
published
3.06
Tim McMahon
published
3.04
John Harlow
published
3.04
George Corbett
published
2.99
Rob McGarrah
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.92
James Bowers
published
2.91
Ashraf Habib
published 3
2.85
Matt Williamson
published
Rodney Matthews
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Robert Hutchins
25W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%33%67%
3.56
3.5
Andrew Curso
39W–13L career · 6 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.26
Tom Petersen
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%1%
3.16
Mark Fossum
25W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%26%74%
3.09
Tim McMahon
1W–16L career · no lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.06
John Harlow
8W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%38%62%
3.04
George Corbett
8W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%40%60%
3.04
3
Rob McGarrah
70W–45L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%53%47%
2.99
James Bowers
26W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
2.92
3
Ashraf Habib
16W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
2.91
Matt Williamson
5W–11L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%15%
2.85
Rodney Matthews
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.