Teams

Urban, Rick

2025 Adult 18 & Over Winter 2.5W - 5.0 & Open · 4.0 Men

14 players · average NTRP 3.75 / HEART OF AMERICA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2024-11-02vs Hanover, ScottLost 03
L#1 DoublesRavi Bhagat / Mark Spears vs Piers Pener / Tristan Houchin2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTom Spenceri / Nathan Gray vs Scott Williamson / Anthony Seim3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLucky Chawla / Mark Murphy vs Blake Thorne / Andrew Hall2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Paul Spears
published
3.62
Dennis Cruise
published 4
3.57
Tom Spenceri
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.49
Riley Siemers
published
3.46
Joseph Stanziola
published
3.45
Norman Friedman
published
3.45
Ravi Bhagat
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
James Dawkins
published
3.36
Rick Urban
published
3.28
Mark Spears
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Nathan Gray
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
Abiodun Akinwuntan
published 3.5
Lucky Chawla
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sam Cargnel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Norman Friedman + James Dawkins6649% games+6.7% vs expected
Tom Spenceri + Nathan Gray3353% games+5.5% vs expected
Norman Friedman + Sam Cargnel5747% games−8.8% vs expected
Abiodun Akinwuntan + James Dawkins41238% games−11.8% vs expected
Norman Friedman + Nathan Gray0531% games−14.7% vs expected
Rick Urban + Abiodun Akinwuntan134 matchesnot enough data
Rick Urban + Paul Spears314 matchesnot enough data
Rick Urban + Riley Siemers033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paul Spears
57W–31L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Dennis Cruise
18W–19L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.62
Tom Spenceri
8W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.57
Riley Siemers
8W–14L career · no lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
3.49
Joseph Stanziola
11W–22L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.46
Norman Friedman
49W–67L career · no lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
3.45
Ravi Bhagat
12W–32L career · 1 line in 2025
65%35%<1%
3.45
James Dawkins
22W–50L career · no lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
3.40
Rick Urban
9W–32L career · no lines in 2025
84%16%<1%
3.36
Mark Spears
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
95%5%<1%
3.28
Nathan Gray
13W–32L career · 1 line in 2025
96%4%<1%
3.25
3.5
Abiodun Akinwuntan
11W–42L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Lucky Chawla
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sam Cargnel
22W–24L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.