Teams

PD55/GEORGE-WORRELL/FTC

2025 USTA Adult 55 & Over - PD · 3.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 2.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-03-30vs PD55/Trexler/FTCLost 02
L#1 DoublesKaren Worrell / Denise King vs Sandy Trexler / Jane Quick4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesGeraldine George / Laura Floyd vs Sandra Hathorn / Linda Cox4-6, 1-6
2025-03-08vs PD55/Trexler/FTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesGeraldine George / Elizabeth McLean vs Pamela Weinberg / Pamela Cody3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJanet Sims / Denise King vs Sandy Trexler / Linda Freeman0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMeg Brunson / Mary Nickel vs Jill McMillan / Josephine Killham1-1
2025-02-08vs PD55/Trexler/FTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesEvelyn Goforth / Elizabeth McLean vs Pamela Weinberg / Pamela Cody0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesGeraldine George / Laura Floyd vs Sandy Trexler / Linda Freeman0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJanet Sims / Denise King vs Jill McMillan / Josephine Killham1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.57 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.83
Kathleen Stedman
published
2.75
Julieanne Yarnal
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Meg Brunson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.64
Evelyn Goforth
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.62
Lorraine Tindal
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.52
Kristen Perkins
published
2.44
Elizabeth McLean
published
2.41
Laura Floyd
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Denise King
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.16
Karen Worrell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Geraldine George
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Janet Sims
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Mary Nickel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Pamela Richardson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lorraine Tindal + Meg Brunson3258% gamesnot enough data
Kathleen Stedman + Julieanne Yarnal224 matchesnot enough data
Evelyn Goforth + Karen Worrell033 matchesnot enough data
Evelyn Goforth + Laura Floyd213 matchesnot enough data
Julieanne Yarnal + Meg Brunson033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathleen Stedman
13W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.83
Julieanne Yarnal
12W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
2.75
Meg Brunson
9W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Evelyn Goforth
5W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
2.64
Lorraine Tindal
26W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%20%80%
2.62
Kristen Perkins
13W–17L career · no lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
2.52
Elizabeth McLean
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
2.44
Laura Floyd
7W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
2.41
2.5
Denise King
0W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Karen Worrell
2W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
0%99%1%
2.16
Geraldine George
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Janet Sims
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Nickel
9W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Pamela Richardson
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.