Teams

McElhany - PCC

2026 Escambia Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-22vs Escambia/SchmidtLost 12
L#1 DoublesForrest Neal / Brody Mcelhany vs Tracy Schmidt / Jim Smith4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesGregory Vierheilig vs Rick Bucco0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJoshua Lewis / Mike Esmonde vs Hunter Stark / Victor Agadzi4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-04-15vs Escambia/SchmidtLost 12
L#1 DoublesJoshua Lewis / Shamus Prindiville vs Michael Haack / Beau Bullard2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesMike Esmonde vs Rick Bucco4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCharles Mcaleer / Gregory Vierheilig vs Bradford Grimmel / Thomas Schellin3-6, 3-6
2026-04-08vs Escambia/SchmidtLost 03
L#1 DoublesMatthew Myer / Joshua Lewis vs Ryan Sellars / Rick Bucco5-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesMike Esmonde / Will Grace vs Victor Agadzi / Jason Twigg6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesHurst Butts / Eric Rasmussen vs Beau Bullard / Jim Ballentine4-6, 2-6
2026-04-01vs Escambia/SchmidtSplit 22
W#1 DoublesForrest Neal / Kyle Harvey vs Tracy Schmidt / Beau Bullard7-5, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJoshua Lewis vs Rick Bucco3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMike Esmonde / Hurst Butts vs Bradford Grimmel / Hunter Stark7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCharles Mcaleer / Eric Rasmussen vs Michael Haack / Jim Ballentine3-6, 4-6
2026-03-25vs Escambia/SchmidtLost 12
W#1 DoublesShamus Prindiville / Joshua Lewis vs Jonathan Llanera / Jerry Clark6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBrody Mcelhany / Matthew Myer vs Hunter Stark / Bradford Grimmel6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesGregory Vierheilig / Mike Esmonde vs Jim Smith / Ryan Sellars2-6, 3-6
2026-03-18vs Escambia/SchmidtLost 13
W#1 DoublesShamus Prindiville / Kyle Harvey vs Jonathan Llanera / Bradford Grimmel6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesCharles Mcaleer vs Rick Bucco3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesForrest Neal / Joshua Lewis vs Tracy Schmidt / Jason Twigg2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesGregory Vierheilig / Ryan Campbell vs Jaymes Tran / Michael Haack1-6, 2-6
2026-03-11vs Escambia/SchmidtLost 13
L#1 DoublesForrest Neal / Ryan Campbell vs Tracy Schmidt / Jason Twigg3-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesBrody Mcelhany vs Rick Bucco5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJoshua Lewis / Charles Mcaleer vs Jonathan Llanera / Bradford Grimmel3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMike Esmonde / Matthew Myer vs Hunter Stark / Thomas Schellin3-6, 6-0, 1-0
2026-03-04vs Escambia/SchmidtLost 13
L#1 DoublesKyle Harvey / Brody Mcelhany vs Tracy Schmidt / Jerry Clark2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMatthew Myer vs Jason Twigg3-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCharles Mcaleer / Gregory Vierheilig vs Jim Smith / Ryan Sellars2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesShamus Prindiville / Ryan Campbell vs Jaymes Tran / Jim Ballentine6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Shamus Prindiville
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.95
Kyle Harvey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Ryan Campbell
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.79
Gregory Vierheilig
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.76
Forrest Neal
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.71
Mike Esmonde
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.71
Matthew Myer
usually #1 Doubles 25%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.66
Joshua Lewis
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
2.65
Brody Mcelhany
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.56
Eric Rasmussen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.49
Charles Mcaleer
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
Hurst Butts
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Will Grace
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joshua Lewis + Shamus Prindiville314 matchesnot enough data
Brody Mcelhany + Matthew Myer213 matchesnot enough data
Forrest Neal + Kyle Harvey303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shamus Prindiville
11W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%33%67%
3.06
Kyle Harvey
7W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
Ryan Campbell
2W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%86%14%
2.85
Gregory Vierheilig
3W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
Forrest Neal
7W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
Mike Esmonde
5W–14L career · 6 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
Matthew Myer
14W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
Joshua Lewis
5W–7L career · 7 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
2.66
3
Brody Mcelhany
8W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
2.65
Eric Rasmussen
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
2.56
3
Charles Mcaleer
3W–6L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
2.49
Hurst Butts
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Will Grace
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.