Teams

AATL18/Hules/Woodside

2023 SC Adult 18 & Over-AATL · Adult Women 18 & Over-3.5 Day

7 players · average NTRP / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Adult Women 18 & Over-3.5 Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Lori Pope
published
3.29
Erin Runnels
published
3.23
Lorraine Dokas
published
3.13
Faris Connor
published
3.07
Joy Hules
published
3.06
Kristen Burns
published
Shirley White
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lori Pope
80W–41L career · no lines in 2023
<1%42%58%
3.53
Erin Runnels
8W–9L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
Lorraine Dokas
23W–23L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Faris Connor
17W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%17%83%
3.13
Joy Hules
10W–19L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.07
Kristen Burns
17W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%32%68%
3.06
Shirley White
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.