Teams

Team 2 Wise Ace Goats

2024 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 4.25 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 DoublesMilin Iyer / Helmut Klemperer vs Danny McBride / John Motz5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2024-03-19vs Team 7 CourtmastersLost 01
L#1 DoublesJagannath Chakravarty / Justin Dorsk vs Vijeaswaran Velusamy / JANAK MEHTA1-6, 2-6
2024-03-16vs Team 9 Wolves teamLost 01
L#2 DoublesMilin Iyer / Helmut Klemperer vs XIAOCHUN JI / Frank Wang4-6, 2-5
2024-03-08vs Team 3 ServeAcesWon 10
W#1 DoublesJonathan Kim / Justin Dorsk vs Sanjivan Sivapiragasam / Anthony McGovern6-2, 6-1
2024-02-21vs Team 3 ServeAcesWon 10
W#2 DoublesLutz Braum / Milin Iyer vs Ronald Oberbillig / Stephen Worrall6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-02-10vs Team 1 High VoltageLost 01
L#1 DoublesMilin Iyer / Thoufiq Kaleemullah vs Quinn Fiscus / Thuan Lai1-6, 1-6
2024-02-03vs Team 6 ZaretLost 02
L#1 DoublesSumeet Chawla / Justin Dorsk vs Jeff Buhl / David Todd1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMilin Iyer / Yong Kim vs Everett Diederiks / Michael Healy3-6, 5-5
2024-01-27vs Team 7 CourtmastersLost 01
L#1 DoublesLutz Braum / Justin Dorsk vs Vijeaswaran Velusamy / Mike Metzger5-7, 6-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
3.95
Justin Dorsk
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.88
Lutz Braum
published
3.76
Thoufiq Kaleemullah
published
3.59
Milin Iyer
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.27
Yong Kim
published
Helmut Klemperer
published
Sumeet Chawla
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Justin Dorsk + Milin Iyer033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jagannath Chakravarty
12W–8L career · no lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
4.06
4.5
Justin Dorsk
126W–83L career · 4 lines in 2024
65%35%<1%
3.95
Lutz Braum
15W–22L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.88
Thoufiq Kaleemullah
8W–4L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.76
4
Milin Iyer
99W–128L career · 5 lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.59
Yong Kim
5W–19L career · no lines in 2024
95%5%<1%
3.27
Helmut Klemperer
7W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sumeet Chawla
23W–12L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.