Teams

Walker

2025 Loudoun Mixed 18 & Over · Loudoun Mixed 18 & Over 6.0

14 players · average NTRP 2.83 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-05-20vs Kemon - Kiss my AceLost 01
L#2 DoublesQian Sheng / Benoit Kroely vs Anusha Prasad / Ted Michaels6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2025-05-05vs Bixler - Play It ForwardWon 10
W#2 DoublesBenoit Kroely / Julia Shin vs Chandra Bittner / Jake Bittner4-6, 5-2
2025-04-18vs CrenshawLost 02
L#1 DoublesBenoit Kroely / Jian Wen vs Charles Penunia / Stephanie Place6-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesAksana Bybel / Robert Bybel vs DeAnna Burke / Jason Burke1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-04-14vs Klinge-HolguinLost 01
L#1 DoublesRobert Bybel / Aksana Bybel vs Benjamin Butler / Madison Humerick2-6, 2-6
2025-04-05vs Bixler - Play It ForwardSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJian Wen / Benoit Kroely vs John Bahlman / Patricia Hathaway6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAksana Bybel / Robert Bybel vs Christy Bixler / Jason Hovda4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Mixed 18 & Over 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Benoit Kroely
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.01
Elizabeth Clarke
published
2.99
Robert Bybel
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.84
Lei Wang
published
2.70
Julia Shin
published
2.61
Ando Shin
published 3
2.53
Qian Sheng
published
2.53
Donald Clarke
published
2.35
Aksana Bybel
published 2.5
Brian McDowell
published 2.5
Christopher Walker
published 2.5
Jian Wen
published
Michael Hubona
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Benoit Kroely
96W–41L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.28
Elizabeth Clarke
5W–22L career · no lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.01
3.5
Robert Bybel
8W–42L career · 3 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.99
Lei Wang
15W–13L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
Julia Shin
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.70
3
Ando Shin
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.61
Qian Sheng
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
2.53
Donald Clarke
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
2.53
2.5
Aksana Bybel
2W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2025
0%86%14%
2.35
2.5
Brian McDowell
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Christopher Walker
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jian Wen
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Laura Schreeder Hubona
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Hubona
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.