Teams

Team 7 Courtmasters

2025 NOVA Mixed 18 & Over · NOVA Mixed 18 & Over 8.0

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-04-03vs Team 2 SpoilersLost 01
L#3 DoublesAndre Siqueira / Kathleen Leary vs Laith Layous / Alissa Forbes5-7, 3-5
2025-03-26vs Team 6 BAD10SWon 20
W#2 DoublesSpoorti Dandridge / Michael Nguyen vs Christopher Beausoleil / Shelby Rothberg6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAndre Siqueira / Kathleen Leary vs Cecelia Campbell / Jacques Beaudry-Losique6-2, 6-3
2025-03-09vs Team 3 Over ServedWon 10
W#2 DoublesSherra Dung / Charles Tellis vs Dara Okamoto / Christopher Cosca6-2, 6-3
2025-03-05vs Team 1 Mad Ranchers 8.0Lost 01
L#3 DoublesCharles Tellis / Kathleen Leary vs Kenta Goto / June Wheatley3-6, 6-7
2025-02-26vs Team 6 BAD10SLost 01
L#1 DoublesAndre Siqueira / Kathleen Leary vs Christopher Beausoleil / Erin Davis4-6, 3-5
2025-02-12vs Team 4 Grace's AcesWon 10
W#3 DoublesCharles Tellis / Sherra Dung vs Brandon Kondis / Aileen Jones6-4, 5-4
2025-01-25Won 10
W#2 DoublesEric Nguyen / Spoorti Dandridge vs Mike Burgoyne / Michelle Lettmann7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Mixed 18 & Over 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Andre Siqueira
published 4.5
4.21
Charles Tellis
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.01
Quinn Fiscus
published
3.75
Spoorti Dandridge
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Sherra Dung
published
3.41
Margaret Rubin
published
3.34
Calvin Nguyen
published 3.5
3.30
Kathleen Leary
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.27
Yong Kim
published
Kevin Tindle
published
Lara Brandes
published
Lauren Sadulsky
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Andre Siqueira
3W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Charles Tellis
92W–54L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
4.21
Quinn Fiscus
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
4.01
4
Spoorti Dandridge
82W–62L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.75
Sherra Dung
12W–7L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Margaret Rubin
16W–30L career · no lines in 2025
74%26%<1%
3.41
3.5
Calvin Nguyen
11W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Kathleen Leary
160W–190L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.30
Yong Kim
5W–19L career · no lines in 2025
95%5%<1%
3.27
Kevin Tindle
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lara Brandes
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lauren Sadulsky
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.