Teams

Abdin/Fayetteville/FAC

2026 Tri-Level 18 & Over · 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.17 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-04vs Vargo-Lasater/Rogers/SVCCWon 21
L#1 DoublesJavier Cordero / Max Garcia vs Jackson Arbeitman / Austin Lasater4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLance Court / Michael Overman vs Deric Neal / Nicolas Mejia6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTalyn Benton / Chad Paschall vs Joseph Gagliardo / Tr Rose1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-06-20vs Smith-Cockrell/Rogers/MRCLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichael Overman / Max Garcia vs Cooper Barkley / Bruce Barkley3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJamal Abdin / Lance Court vs Ryan Morris / Sean Mahoney6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChad Paschall / Talyn Benton vs Edward Houstman / Matthew Hanafin6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Evan Rush
published
3.65
Javier Cordero
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Michael Overman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.55
Jamal Abdin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.51
Lance Court
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Clay Galloway
published 3.5
3.48
Evan Mullins
published
3.22
Nate Mullen
published
3.19
Coy Puryear
published 3
3.03
Talyn Benton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
John Mccormick
published
2.90
Chad Paschall
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.51
Herbert Lewis
published
Reid Backhouse
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jamal Abdin + Evan Mullins314 matchesnot enough data
Lance Court + Jamal Abdin123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Evan Rush
17W–4L career · no lines in 2026
<1%12%88%
3.67
Javier Cordero
14W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
14%85%1%
3.65
Michael Overman
26W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%20%80%
3.62
Jamal Abdin
36W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.55
Lance Court
26W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.51
3.5
Clay Galloway
22W–4L career · no lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
3.48
Evan Mullins
11W–3L career · no lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
3.48
Nate Mullen
3W–11L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%2%
3.22
3
Coy Puryear
14W–3L career · no lines in 2026
<1%9%91%
3.19
Talyn Benton
13W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.03
John Mccormick
3W–4L career · no lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Chad Paschall
17W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%75%24%
2.90
Herbert Lewis
3W–13L career · no lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
2.51
Reid Backhouse
3W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.