Teams

Let's go!

2022 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 / ALASKA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-05-08vs AnthonyLost 04
L#1 DoublesAlan Green / Gerald Randell vs Anthony Brooks / Joe Buckwalter2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesPAUL RISSE vs Marco Terracciano2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Leonard / Chris Love vs Adam Choi / Willy Stone3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSen Tan / BOHYUN BAHNG vs Bryan Martin / Krisada Meephothong1-6, 0-6
2022-05-08vs AnthonyLost 04
L#1 DoublesPAUL RISSE / Sen Tan vs Joe Buckwalter / Anthony Brooks6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesChris Love vs Marco Terracciano0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAlan Green / Michael Leonard vs Willy Stone / Adam Choi1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesGerald Randell / BOHYUN BAHNG vs Zachary Vincent / Jeremy Conkling2-6, 2-6
2022-05-07vs AnthonyLost 04
L#1 DoublesBOHYUN BAHNG / Douglas Bliss vs Anthony Brooks / Joe Buckwalter1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesPAUL RISSE vs Marco Terracciano2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAlan Green / Chris Love vs Bryan Martin / Jeremy Conkling0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSen Tan / Gerald Randell vs Krisada Meephothong / Zachary Vincent4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Let's go!0301530178

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Chris Love
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Michael Leonard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.79
Douglas Bliss
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.47
PAUL RISSE
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Alan Green
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 0
BOHYUN BAHNG
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Gerald Randell
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Sen Tan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Douglas Bliss + Michael Leonard2444% gamesnot enough data
BOHYUN BAHNG + Michael Leonard044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Chris Love
3W–18L career · type T · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Michael Leonard
38W–51L career · type S · 2 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Douglas Bliss
52W–43L career · type M · 1 line in 2022
95%5%<1%
2.79
2.5
PAUL RISSE
46W–64L career · 3 lines in 2022
0%59%41%
2.47
0
Alan Green
20W–39L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
BOHYUN BAHNG
5W–32L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Gerald Randell
2W–7L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sen Tan
5W–16L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.