Teams

(PRR 2) Brookhaven/Harllee M4.5

2023 DALLAS TENNIS 40 & Over ADULT M Saturday · M4.5

17 players · average NTRP 4.33 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for M4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.09 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.33
Naganand Jagadeesh
published
4.27
Shawn Phelan
published
4.24
Lee Willhite
published
4.24
Lloyd McGuire
published
4.14
Neil Schlager
published
4.12
Kenji Hashimoto
published
4.10
Ron Morrison
published
4.10
Juan Manuel Rios
published
4.07
Jacinto Rivera
published 4.5
4.00
Scot Sandlin
published
3.99
Collin Thompson
published 4.5
3.93
Laurence Newell
published
3.89
John Tomas
published
3.88
Don Buford
published 4
Keith Heier
published
Peter Laun
published
Yuri Yermakov
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shawn Phelan + Ron Morrison8363% games+11.4% vs expected
Neil Schlager + Lee Willhite4551% games−1.0% vs expected
Jacinto Rivera + Juan Manuel Rios6355% gamesnot enough data
Scot Sandlin + Naganand Jagadeesh5258% gamesnot enough data
Neil Schlager + Laurence Newell224 matchesnot enough data
Lee Willhite + Lloyd McGuire224 matchesnot enough data
Scot Sandlin + Don Buford033 matchesnot enough data
Laurence Newell + Collin Thompson033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Naganand Jagadeesh
9W–6L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%10%
4.33
Shawn Phelan
19W–11L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
4.27
Lee Willhite
10W–8L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
4.24
Lloyd McGuire
12W–7L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
4.24
Neil Schlager
16W–19L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%<1%
4.14
Kenji Hashimoto
17W–10L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
4.12
Ron Morrison
13W–8L career · no lines in 2023
21%78%<1%
4.10
Juan Manuel Rios
16W–17L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
4.10
4.5
Jacinto Rivera
12W–11L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
4.07
Scot Sandlin
8W–9L career · no lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
4.00
4.5
Collin Thompson
0W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2023
52%48%<1%
3.99
Laurence Newell
7W–15L career · no lines in 2023
70%30%<1%
3.93
John Tomas
22W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.89
4
Don Buford
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.88
Keith Heier
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Peter Laun
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Yuri Yermakov
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.