Teams

Curtis/Chattanooga

2025 Tri Level 55 & Over · 3.0

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TENNESSEE

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Vachon000000
2Curtis/Chattanooga000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Hiroshi Aoki
published 4
3.77
Mitchell Kernea
published
3.40
Joe Buckley
published
3.21
Scott Higgins
published
3.11
Matt Muhlada
published
3.09
Scott Hamlin
published
2.79
Parmesh Venkatesu
published
2.65
Lee Carroll
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Hiroshi Aoki
11W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.92
Mitchell Kernea
8W–0L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
Joe Buckley
12W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%21%
3.40
Scott Higgins
44W–37L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.21
Matt Muhlada
17W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.11
Scott Hamlin
2W–13L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.09
Parmesh Venkatesu
16W–11L career · no lines in 2025
1%94%5%
2.79
Lee Carroll
15W–32L career · no lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
2.65

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.