Teams

MILLBRAE RC 18AM4.5A

2024 ADULT 18&Over · Men's 4.5

14 players · average NTRP 4.62 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-06-15vs PENINSULA GCC 18AM4.5ALost 01
L#2 SinglesBrian Heimbecker vs Trevor Branon2-6, 1-6
2024-06-09vs BAY CLUB SF TENNIS 18AM4.5ALost 01
L#1 SinglesBrian Heimbecker vs Michael Franchi0-6, 4-6
2024-05-28vs PENINSULA GCC 18AM4.5AWon 10
W#2 DoublesWesley Kong / Brian Heimbecker vs Todd Lewis / Nathan Reynolds6-3, 6-2
2024-05-26vs BAY CLUB SF TENNIS 18AM4.5AWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrian Heimbecker / Jonathan Risos vs Taylor T Leese / Tri Tran1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-05-02Lost 01
L#2 SinglesBrian Heimbecker vs Guillaume Sabourin0-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesBrian Heimbecker vs Slava Moudryi2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-04-17Won 10
W#2 SinglesBrian Heimbecker vs James Kim2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 DoublesBrian Heimbecker / Jonathan Risos vs Eric Jue / Dave Mickle6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.12 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Stephen Ahnert
published
4.32
Paul Choppi
published
4.30
Brandon Lamon
published 4.5
4.29
Brian Heimbecker
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 5
4.27
Eric Tsai
published
4.18
Chris Hester
published 4.5
4.15
Jonathan Risos
published
4.15
Jonathon Feyerherm
published
4.14
Manolete Garcia
published
3.95
Aroop Ganguly
published 4.5
3.93
Sam Finegold
published
3.75
Musashi Okada
published
3.69
Richard Lobo
published
Garrett Chun
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephen Ahnert
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.38
Paul Choppi
13W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
4.32
4.5
Brandon Lamon
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
4.30
5
Brian Heimbecker
367W–83L career · 8 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.29
Eric Tsai
16W–9L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
4.27
4.5
Chris Hester
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
4.18
Jonathan Risos
16W–13L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
4.15
Jonathon Feyerherm
23W–20L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%1%
4.15
Manolete Garcia
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
15%84%1%
4.14
4.5
Aroop Ganguly
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
64%36%<1%
3.95
Sam Finegold
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.93
Musashi Okada
9W–2L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
Richard Lobo
13W–19L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
Garrett Chun
7W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.