Teams

Brown 55s 7.5 Combo W Mon PM

2025 Piedmont Combo 55 & Over · 7.5 Women 55 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-10-06vs Albright 55s 7.5 Combo W Mon PMWon 21
W#1 DoublesVirginia Easley / Jacqueline Herron vs Lee Beyer-Meley / Maggie Riley6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMinerva Loran / Susan Rabold vs Britt Flanagan / Danielle Broadstreet2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKathy Brown / Carolyn Pellerin vs Carole Albright / Virginia Christman6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesKathy Brown / Kathy Pace vs Diane Kroeger / Donna Warrick7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMinerva Loran / Jacqueline Herron vs Bonnie Satterfield / Bobbie Westrick4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJanel Green / Krisla Berreth vs Trish Holder / Lynette Paley7-5, 6-4
W#1 DoublesLisa Andree / Kathy Pace vs Jenny Kemp / Amanda Reynolds7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSusan Rabold / Minerva Loran vs Terri Shantry / Lynette Paley6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMarsha Tice / Janel Green vs Bonnie Satterfield / Bobbie Westrick7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Virginia Easley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Pam McAmis
published
3.61
Carolyn Pellerin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
Sallye Parker
published
3.55
Lisa Andree
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Minerva Loran
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.44
Jacqueline Herron
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.35
Marsha Tice
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.31
Kathy Brown
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.28
Krisla Berreth
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.23
Susan Rabold
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Janel Green
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathy Brown + Virginia Easley2346% gamesnot enough data
Jacqueline Herron + Susan Rabold224 matchesnot enough data
Jacqueline Herron + Krisla Berreth123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Virginia Easley
24W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Pam McAmis
13W–22L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Carolyn Pellerin
8W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.61
Sallye Parker
146W–124L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.59
Lisa Andree
24W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.55
Minerva Loran
13W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.54
Jacqueline Herron
36W–28L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
Marsha Tice
20W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
Kathy Brown
14W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
Krisla Berreth
24W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Susan Rabold
14W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Janel Green
17W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.