Teams

CKing/JMu (Life Time)

2026 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 3.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.11 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-04-22vs LFerguson/KCronin (Piper Glen)Lost 04
L#1 DoublesAnait Balasanyan / Kirsten Rodgers vs Lindsey Ferguson / Dawn Tenev1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesSeung Hee Noh vs Lauren Taylor Grames2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMallory Burns / Raegan Wright vs Stephanie Rock / Joanne Joliet6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesChristine King / Valeria Gonzalez vs Trisha Smith / Kathy Harborne5-7, 4-6
2026-04-15vs KLull (Blakeney)Lost 14
L#1 DoublesChristine King / Anait Balasanyan vs Kristen Dodds / Carrie Childs1-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesRaegan Wright vs Rachel Grantham0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMallory Burns / Avani Bhamidipati vs Jill Griset / Wendy Rossi1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesValeria Gonzalez vs Madison Murray1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesSun Moon / Yesenia Berges vs Virginia Katzen / Katie Vaughan5-7, 5-5
2026-04-08vs LDiman/TMagee (Carmel)Lost 04
L#1 DoublesRaegan Wright / Christine King vs Beth Hahn / Courtney Reichs Mixon1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAnait Balasanyan / Mallory Burns vs Tricia Magee / Morgan Peterson2-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesValeria Gonzalez vs Katie Wagner3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesYesenia Berges / Jo Dockins vs Chelsea Rhodes / Keri Beach2-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesAddison Rohm / Sun Moon vs Carolyn Schaus / Lisa Wright3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesRaegan Wright vs Ali Sacopulos2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJo Dockins / Yesenia Berges vs Julie Carlsen / Melissa Misplay3-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesValeria Gonzalez vs Jessica Bradford0-6, 5-7
2026-03-25vs KLoor/SJPragasam (Hornets Nest)Won 21
L#1 DoublesSun Moon / Yesenia Berges vs Amanda Cheek / Kate Kirschner0-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesValeria Gonzalez vs Erin Roach7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMallory Burns / Christine King vs Elizabeth Kennard / Kelly Sylvester6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2026-03-18vs MKelling/RJoplin (Park Road)Lost 23
L#1 DoublesSun Moon / Christine King vs Palak Merchant / Katie van Valkinburgh0-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesMallory Burns vs Jennifer Dandison0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSeung Hee Noh / Avani Bhamidipati vs Heather Skelton / Susan Hitchens6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesRaegan Wright vs Renay Joplin1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAnait Balasanyan / Kirsten Rodgers vs Allyson Dunlap / Stephanie Guffin6-4, 7-5
2026-03-11vs PMullins/LQuattlebaum (OPRC)Lost 14
L#1 DoublesJoyce Mu / Kirsten Rodgers vs Patty Mullins / Mehgan Beverley0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesAnait Balasanyan vs Naomi O'Brien2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesSun Moon / Yesenia Berges vs Alyce Lofgren / Sandra Troni6-4, 6-1
L#2 SinglesRaegan Wright vs Anne Schmitt2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesValeria Gonzalez / Avani Bhamidipati vs Lori Quattlebaum / Marise Kumar4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Addison Rohm
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Yesenia Berges
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.10
Valeria Gonzalez
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.00
Anait Balasanyan
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 3
2.93
Mallory Burns
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 3
2.87
Joyce Mu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Seung Hee Noh
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.76
Avani Bhamidipati
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.75
Christine King
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.69
Raegan Wright
usually #2 Singles 25%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.48
2.31
Kirsten Rodgers
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Jo Dockins
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Sun Moon
published
Ty Hands
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Avani Bhamidipati + Anait Balasanyan10554% gamesnot enough data
Christine King + Mallory Burns2345% gamesnot enough data
Christine King + Avani Bhamidipati224 matchesnot enough data
Mallory Burns + Anait Balasanyan213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Addison Rohm
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Yesenia Berges
21W–37L career · 5 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.12
Valeria Gonzalez
1W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.10
3
Anait Balasanyan
56W–42L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
Mallory Burns
45W–67L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93
Joyce Mu
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
Seung Hee Noh
38W–34L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Avani Bhamidipati
32W–35L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Christine King
29W–51L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.75
3
Raegan Wright
17W–37L career · 10 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Linda Burks-Adams
41W–68L career · no lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
2.48
Kirsten Rodgers
1W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%92%8%
2.31
Jo Dockins
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sun Moon
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Ty Hands
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.