← Teams

ETC-Aces@Deuce-Edwards

2019 Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Men

2 players · average NTRP 3.25 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Evan Cohn
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.91
James Roma
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
Results7 ties
2019-06-30Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesBob Edwards / Evan Cohn vs Kevin Finan / Eric Markell7-6, 6-2
2019-06-28Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesEvan Cohn / Bob Edwards vs Todd Hennelly / Jeff Welter7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2018-11-04Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesJames Roma / Krishnan Gowri vs Kenneth Drake / George Wright6-3, 6-1
2018-10-19Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesJames Roma / Stevan Phillips vs Michael Bjorn / Michael McPherson6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesEvan Cohn / Bob Edwards vs Carl Nielsen / Douglas Smith7-5, 6-3
2018-09-30Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesJames Roma / Mike Rayburn vs Steve Cissell / Steven Cole6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2018-09-22Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesJames Roma / Mike Rayburn vs Jim MacConnell / Bruce Easter6-1, 6-4
2018-09-16Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesBob Edwards / Evan Cohn vs Victor Cao / Michael Dillard6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMark Trumbauer / James Roma vs Mike Hascall / Steven Lockett7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Evan Cohn
144W–75L career
0%81%19%
3.51
3
James Roma
63W–35L career
0%92%8%
2.91

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.