Teams

WO-Tate

2021 Richmond Mixed 18 & Over Winter · Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 8.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.86 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-03-28vs RAIN-LaCroixWon 20
W#2 DoublesGena Burr / Stephen Mathews vs Julie Stivers / Joe Lacroix3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHeather Garnett / John Chenault V vs Suzanne Spadafora / Christopher Stone6-4, 6-1
2021-03-20vs MAC-WhiteLost 01
L#2 DoublesWilliam Tate / Sallie Mayer vs Jeffrey Johnson / Delaney Rhodus2-6, 4-6
2021-03-14vs WW-WaylandLost 01
L#2 DoublesGena Burr / Stephen Mathews vs Beth Lane / Chris Gilman4-6, 3-6
2021-03-06vs ACAC-StephensLost 01
L#2 DoublesWilliam Tate / Sallie Mayer vs Sung Kang / Valerie Stephens1-6, 4-6
2021-02-27vs BURK-MatthewsLost 01
L#3 DoublesSallie Mayer / William Tate vs Samuel Poole / Kathy Denunzio6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2021-01-23vs CCV-AtiyehLost 01
L#3 DoublesHeather Garnett / David Aschheim vs Wesley Atiyeh / Susan Trigg2-6, 1-6
2021-01-10vs ACAC-LarueLost 01
L#1 DoublesHeather Garnett / John Chenault V vs Denise Weisberg / Donnell Stewart4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.39
John Chenault V
published
3.92
Laura Granger
published 4.5
3.92
Peyton Curdts
published
3.84
Gena Burr
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.78
James Dunton
published 4
3.73
Sharon Fuller
published
3.69
Heather Garnett
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.69
Natalie Dunton
published
3.67
Marc Oosterhuis
published
3.36
Sallie Mayer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.33
David Aschheim
published 3.5
3.27
Stephen Mathews
published
3.09
Brian Ford
published 3.5
3.04
Bo Bowden
published 3.5
2.95
William Tate
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Chenault V
9W–3L career · no lines in 2021
<1%80%19%
4.39
4.5
Laura Granger
131W–99L career · no lines in 2021
72%28%<1%
3.92
Peyton Curdts
3W–1L career · no lines in 2021
<1%74%26%
3.92
4
Gena Burr
115W–77L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
James Dunton
6W–4L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.78
Sharon Fuller
9W–6L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Heather Garnett
50W–63L career · 3 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.69
Natalie Dunton
3W–3L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.69
Marc Oosterhuis
12W–7L career · no lines in 2021
9%90%1%
3.67
Sallie Mayer
85W–101L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
David Aschheim
16W–7L career · no lines in 2021
1%90%9%
3.33
Stephen Mathews
25W–13L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Brian Ford
7W–9L career · no lines in 2021
25%75%<1%
3.09
3.5
Bo Bowden
1W–3L career · no lines in 2021
36%64%<1%
3.04
William Tate
14W–14L career · no lines in 2021
64%36%<1%
2.95

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.