Teams

Tri-Men

2025 TRI-Level · Men's- 4.5,4.0,3.5

8 players · average NTRP 4.12 / SOUTHERN ARIZONA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-10-19vs Tri-Level MenLost 02
L#1 DoublesAndrew Kilpatrick / Ryan Hendrickson vs Julian Mirano / Sam Ritchie4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Beckett / Anthony Gray vs James Buckwalter / Jorge Barron4-6, 3-6
2025-10-19vs SAZ Tri Level M- Darrel TomasaLost 03
L#1 DoublesAndrew Kilpatrick / Arturo Prieto vs Greg Desilva / Jason Dickinson5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDaniyar Murataliev / Travis Craddock vs Christopher Linscott / Terry Kirk3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRyan Kopp / Anthony Gray vs Jeffery Williams / Steven Keresztes1-6, 1-6
2025-10-18vs SAZ Tri Level M- Darrel TomasaLost 03
L#1 DoublesArturo Prieto / Andrew Kilpatrick vs Jason Dickinson / Kyle Seyler4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Gonzalez / Travis Craddock vs Christopher Linscott / Terry Kirk4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Beckett / Ryan Kopp vs Jeffery Williams / Steven Keresztes0-6, 1-6
2025-10-18vs Tri-Level MenLost 12
L#1 DoublesAndrew Kilpatrick / Ryan Hendrickson vs Neil Kaura / Matthew Rohne4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDaniyar Murataliev / David Gonzalez vs Rich Cruz / Myls Miller4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesRyan Kopp / Anthony Gray vs Jorge Barron / James Buckwalter6-3, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Men's- 4.5,4.0,3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SAZ Tri Level M- Darrel Tomasa40111255
2Tri-Level Men226613101
3Tri-Men0411123142

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Arturo Prieto
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.25
Ryan Hendrickson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.13
Andrew Kilpatrick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.85
Daniyar Murataliev
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
Travis Craddock
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Ryan Kopp
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.44
Michael Beckett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
Anthony Gray
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew Kilpatrick + Ryan Hendrickson9652% games−1.5% vs expected
Andrew Kilpatrick + Arturo Prieto224 matchesnot enough data
Ryan Kopp + Michael Beckett213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Arturo Prieto
109W–67L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
4.38
Ryan Hendrickson
37W–37L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Andrew Kilpatrick
68W–64L career · 4 lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
4.13
4
Daniyar Murataliev
4W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.85
Travis Craddock
23W–33L career · 2 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.56
Ryan Kopp
27W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46
Michael Beckett
46W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.44
3.5
Anthony Gray
64W–78L career · 3 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.