Teams

Deupree/Memphis

2026 Adult 18 & Over -Memphis · 4.5 Women 18 & over

14 players · average NTRP 4.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-02vs McCalla/MemphisLost 13
L#1 SinglesJulie Moultrie vs Mary Dalto3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesShelley Richter / Jenni Orahood vs Shannon McCalla / Mary Plosser2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesNelli Golmeeva vs Virginia Lang1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesIsabel Xu / Emily Brown vs Meredith Haselwood / Carley Myrick7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2026-05-02vs Douglas/MemphisWon 32
W#1 DoublesMary Johnston Tayloe / Abby Flowers vs Kate Stakem / Christina Edwards6-0, 6-1
L#1 SinglesJulie Moultrie vs Mary Maxwell6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAngie Deupree / Shelley Richter vs Josie Hammons / Ragan Washburn7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKeadrea Wilson vs E'Lane Williams3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLina Yi / Isabel Xu vs Alison Rice / Stephanie Sheahan6-1, 6-2
2026-04-11vs Douglas/MemphisWon 32
L#1 DoublesLina Yi / Wang-Ying Glasgow vs Neely Leavell / Hattie Rounder6-0, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesNelli Golmeeva vs Josie Hammons2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMary Johnston Tayloe / Abby Flowers vs Elizabeth Lewis / Courtney Smith7-5, 6-3
W#2 SinglesJulie Moultrie vs E'Lane Williams6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAngie Deupree / Shelley Richter vs Ana Yambrek / Stephanie Sheahan6-3, 6-3
2026-04-04vs McCalla/MemphisLost 13
L#1 DoublesAbby Flowers / Emily Brown vs Ann Sneed / Jenny Webster5-7, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMelissa Rodriguez Perez vs Mary Dalto2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAngie Deupree / Mary Johnston Tayloe vs Kathy Lee / Kimberly Cox5-7, 4-6
W#2 SinglesJulie Moultrie vs Dana Bray6-4, 7-5
2026-03-28vs McCalla/MemphisLost 05
L#1 DoublesKristi Rice / Molly Coyne vs Kathy Lee / Virginia Lang0-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMelissa Rodriguez Perez vs Mary Dalto2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesShelley Richter / Emily Brown vs Lauren Feury / Ann Sneed4-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesKeadrea Wilson vs Hala Hakim1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesWang-Ying Glasgow / Lina Yi vs Kaitlin Lovern / Christie Smith3-6, 2-6
2026-03-21vs Douglas/MemphisWon 32
L#1 DoublesWang-Ying Glasgow / Shelley Richter vs Neely Leavell / Courtney Smith1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesNelli Golmeeva vs Alison Rice2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAngie Deupree / Mary Johnston Tayloe vs Hattie Rounder / Allison Harris6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesJulie Moultrie vs Elizabeth Carr6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesCher Berberich / Jenni Orahood vs Elizabeth Bennett / Josie Hammons6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Women 18 & over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.04 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.28
Mary Johnston Tayloe
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.25
Molly Coyne
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.20
Wang-Ying Glasgow
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.13
Keadrea Wilson
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
4.11
Abby Flowers
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.09
Lina Yi
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.09
Cher Berberich
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.06
Jenni Orahood
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.00
Melissa Rodriguez Perez
usually #1 Singles 86%, also #2 Singles 14% · published
3.99
Angie Deupree
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.98
Isabel Xu
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.90
Julie Moultrie
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
3.88
Shelley Richter
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.58
Nelli Golmeeva
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 22% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lina Yi + Wang-Ying Glasgow7753% games+0.3% vs expected
Wang-Ying Glasgow + Angie Deupree314 matchesnot enough data
Mary Johnston Tayloe + Angie Deupree213 matchesnot enough data
Lina Yi + Angie Deupree213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Johnston Tayloe
28W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
4.28
Molly Coyne
6W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%4%
4.25
Wang-Ying Glasgow
24W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
4.20
Keadrea Wilson
5W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
4.13
4.5
Abby Flowers
5W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
22%77%<1%
4.11
Lina Yi
17W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
4.09
4.5
Cher Berberich
12W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
25%75%<1%
4.09
Jenni Orahood
12W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
4.06
Melissa Rodriguez Perez
17W–11L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
4.00
4.5
Angie Deupree
26W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
3.99
Isabel Xu
24W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
3.98
Julie Moultrie
11W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
75%25%<1%
3.90
Shelley Richter
8W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
3.88
Nelli Golmeeva
22W–25L career · 9 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.58

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.