Teams

CV-Palm Springs TC/Hoffman

2022 USTA Adult 40 & Over - CV · CV Women 4.5

10 players · average NTRP 4.17 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-04-05Won 10
W#1 DoublesRoseann Harris / Chris Mangan vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-02-19Split 11
W#1 DoublesRoseann Harris / Stacey McCoy vs April Boney / Jan Bulls6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJennifer Baker / Dinora Nava-Oleson vs Juliana Copley / Tammy Peltzer2-6, 4-6
2022-02-12vs CV-Shadow Mountain/Warnack & V BrownSplit 11
W#1 DoublesStacey McCoy / Roseann Harris vs Vickki Schlappi / Michelle Hall6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesChris Mangan / Dinora Nava-Oleson vs Brenda Williams / Valerie Brown4-6, 6-7
L#1 DoublesStacey McCoy / Chris Mangan vs Jane Solomon / Mary Gustafson4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Baker / Dinora Nava-Oleson vs Brooke Shapter / Jan Bulls0-6, 3-6
2022-01-15vs CV-Shadow Mountain/Warnack & V BrownSplit 11
L#2 DoublesAmy Ourso / Stacey McCoy vs Linda Fleiderman / Karen Ames4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJennifer Baker / Dinora Nava-Oleson vs Brenda Williams / Valerie Brown6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2022-01-08Split 11
W#1 DoublesRoseann Harris / Stacey McCoy vs April Boney / Cheryl Thoresen6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRenee Marrotte / Dinora Nava-Oleson vs Brooke Shapter / Jan Bulls3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.96 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.32
Shannon Schuld-Gray
published
4.22
Stacey McCoy
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.18
Renee Marrotte
published
4.09
Amy Ourso
published 4.5
4.06
Kathleen Bradley
published
4.01
Roseann Harris
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.75
Ginny Ehrlich
published 4
3.69
Dinora Nava-Oleson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.31
Doris Hoffmann
published 3.5
Monica McCready
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacey McCoy + Roseann Harris371658% games+4.8% vs expected
Monica McCready + Dinora Nava-Oleson123 matchesnot enough data
Renee Marrotte + Shannon Schuld-Gray303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shannon Schuld-Gray
11W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
4.32
4.5
Stacey McCoy
145W–88L career · 5 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.22
Renee Marrotte
5W–1L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
4.18
4.5
Amy Ourso
22W–21L career · no lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
4.09
Kathleen Bradley
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
4.06
4.5
Roseann Harris
96W–74L career · 4 lines in 2022
46%54%<1%
4.01
4
Ginny Ehrlich
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Dinora Nava-Oleson
6W–27L career · 5 lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.69
3.5
Doris Hoffmann
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
Monica McCready
92W–63L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.