Teams

TOHSNeal

2023 CTRL Tri-Level 18 & Over · Tri-Level 3.5

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2023-08-08vs APEX.HinckleyWon 10
W#1 DoublesDell Pinkston / Barbara Longobardo vs Leslie Roper / Christine Dukiet6-0, 5-7, 1-0
2023-07-27Lost 01
L#2 DoublesStacie Fernstrum / Dell Pinkston vs Angela Ray / Kimberly Hilt3-6, 2-6
2023-07-25Won 10
W#2 DoublesDell Pinkston / Karla Diener vs Renee Getz / Harriet Wilson6-4, 6-1
2023-07-21vs PW.ShortLost 01
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Enderline / Barbara Longobardo vs Andrea Eichenseer / Mookie Lewis0-6, 2-6
2023-07-07vs MD.ChuangLost 01
L#1 DoublesDell Pinkston / Elizabeth Enderline vs Linda Chuang / Becky King4-6, 1-6
2023-06-30vs BENT.HiltLost 01
L#1 DoublesBarbara Longobardo / Dell Pinkston vs Kimberly Hilt / Jannette White1-6, 2-6
2023-06-27vs PW.StutesmanWon 10
W#1 DoublesMiho Ogura / Dell Pinkston vs Suzanne Jeska / Kathryn Stone4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-06-16vs PW.KraftLost 01
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Enderline / Dell Pinkston vs Heather Suddreth / Donna West4-6, 3-6
2023-06-09vs CAS.DeAngelisLost 01
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Enderline / Dell Pinkston vs Susan Boyd / Ann Locher3-6, 2-6
2023-06-06Lost 01
L#2 DoublesDell Pinkston / Stacie Fernstrum vs Kelli Harris / Laurie Reiss1-6, 6-7
2023-06-02vs PW.HovermaleLost 01
L#1 DoublesDell Pinkston / Sharon Neal vs Maura Lever / Angie Smith1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Tri-Level 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Dell Pinkston
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.98
Elizabeth Parrish
published
2.75
Elizabeth Enderline
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
2.43
Lori Neal
published
2.33
Kristina Faulkner
published
2.27
Lauren Spiegel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dell Pinkston + Elizabeth Enderline033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Dell Pinkston
94W–82L career · 10 lines in 2023
<1%23%77%
3.10
Elizabeth Parrish
10W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Elizabeth Enderline
93W–149L career · 4 lines in 2023
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Barbara Longobardo
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
2.60
Lori Neal
2W–9L career · no lines in 2023
70%30%<1%
2.43
Kristina Faulkner
14W–9L career · no lines in 2023
0%89%11%
2.33
Lauren Spiegel
8W–7L career · no lines in 2023
0%95%5%
2.27

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.