Teams

Hunt/18/3.0/M/UC

2026 City Championship 18 & Over - Men · 3.0 (18&O) Men

8 players · average NTRP / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 upcoming
Sep 9 8:00 PM
Baton Rouge Country Club
Sep 16 6:30 PM
BREC Forest Park Tennis Center
Sep 23 6:30 PM
University Club Baton Rouge
Oct 7 8:00 PM
University Club Baton Rouge
Oct 14 8:00 PM
University Club Baton Rouge
Oct 21 6:30 PM
Highland Park Tennis Center
Nov 4 6:30 PM
Highland Park Tennis Center
Nov 11 6:30 PM
Highland Park Tennis Center
Nov 18 6:30 PM
University Club Baton Rouge
Flight standings10 teams · 3.0 (18&O) Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Toben/18/3.0/M/BREC000000
2Dooley/18/3.0/M/BRCC000000
3Moses/18/3.0/M/UC000000
4Tate/18/3.0/M/BREC000000
5Lipani/18/3.0/M/BREC000000
6Wilkinson/18/3.0/M/BREC000000
7Smith/18/3.0/M/CCLA000000
8RABEAUX/18/3.0/M/BREC000000
9Hunt/18/3.0/M/UC000000
10Burns/3.0/18/M/SOAC000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Michael Dupont
published
3.20
Jay Piland
published
3.17
Robert Goodson
published
3.13
Mark Porta
published
3.04
Justin Day
published
3.00
Matt Hunt
published
2.69
James Hammatt
published
2.67
Matthew Beychok
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robert Goodson + James Hammatt9263% games+13.6% vs expected
Matt Hunt + Jay Piland1450% gamesnot enough data
Jay Piland + Michael Dupont4165% gamesnot enough data
Justin Day + Michael Dupont404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Dupont
36W–7L career · no lines in 2026
<1%7%93%
3.20
Jay Piland
65W–25L career · no lines in 2026
<1%8%92%
3.20
Robert Goodson
11W–3L career · no lines in 2026
<1%12%88%
3.17
Mark Porta
2W–3L career · no lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.13
Justin Day
16W–1L career · no lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.04
Matt Hunt
40W–30L career · no lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.00
James Hammatt
13W–5L career · no lines in 2026
0%9%91%
2.69
Matthew Beychok
3W–6L career · no lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.