Teams

LPratt/CManning (Life Time)

2023 Mixed Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Mixed 7.0 - Mon PM

14 players · average NTRP 3.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-24vs JMu (Queens)Won 10
W#1 DoublesKacey Kopley / Nate Siens vs Joyce Mu / Perry SIlver6-4, 7-5
2023-07-17vs KCronin/AFink (Piper Glen)Split 11
W#1 DoublesKacey Kopley / Nate Siens vs Chris Franc / Hayley Franc6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJeff Buturff / Ofelia Claxton vs Jeremy Rhoten / Sheila Passenant1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 DoublesKacey Kopley / Nate Siens vs Ed Huggins / Sophie Karsch6-4, 6-3
2023-07-03vs JMorse (Queens)Won 10
W#2 DoublesOfelia Claxton / Kevin Warren vs Abbey Ellis / Gray Jones4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-06-26vs CSpera (Blakeney)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesNate Siens / Kacey Kopley vs Michelle Ludwiczak / Naveen Sharma1-6, 6-7
2023-06-05vs JMu (Queens)Won 10
W#3 DoublesNate Siens / Ofelia Claxton vs Terrell Foster / Allie Doub6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Mixed 7.0 - Mon PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Michelle Crawford
published
3.78
Nate Siens
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published 4
3.74
Jordan Teel
published
3.72
Charles Manning
published 4
3.53
3.41
Jeff Buturff
published
3.33
Susan Knowlton
published
Greig Altieri
published 3.5
3.23
Ofelia Claxton
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Julie Williams
published
Kacey Kopley
published
Kathleen Ciminelli
published
Kevin Warren
published
Leezah Pratt
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Crawford
28W–17L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Nate Siens
167W–75L career · 9 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.78
Jordan Teel
31W–28L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Charles Manning
18W–22L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Emily Breeze Watson
24W–16L career · no lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
3.53
Jeff Buturff
22W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.41
Susan Knowlton
11W–15L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Greig Altieri
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Ofelia Claxton
126W–107L career · 3 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
Julie Williams
52W–44L career · no lines in 2023
0%<1%>99%
3.20
Kacey Kopley
10W–12L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kathleen Ciminelli
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kevin Warren
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Leezah Pratt
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.