Teams

MHanauer.9.5-DUR

2026 Eno River Combo 18 & Over · 18 & Over Combo 9.5 Men Eve

13 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 upcoming · 2 played
Sep 14 6:30 PM
Eno Valley Swim & Racquet Club
Sep 21 6:30 PM
Elmira Avenue Park
Sep 28 6:30 PM
Eno Valley Swim & Racquet Club
Oct 5 6:30 PM
Elmira Avenue Park
Oct 12 6:30 PM
Eno Valley Swim & Racquet Club
2026-08-31vs JByrd-DURLost 03
L#1 DoublesVisakan Jayakumar / Anil Chawla vs Brett Eckles / Herman Gudjonson1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRyan Sayko / Spencer Llewellyn vs Andrew Perdue / Julien de la Mettrie1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesStewart Bible / Tyler Carroll vs Nicolas Quevedo / Justin Panepinto3-6, 2-6
2026-08-24vs JByrd-DURSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMatthew Hanauer / David Hamrin vs Brett Eckles / Julien de la Mettrie1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesTyler Carroll / Rawle Sue-Ho vs Andrew Perdue / Nicolas Quevedo6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 18 & Over Combo 9.5 Men Eve
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MHanauer.9.5-DUR000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.23 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.72
Geoff Gisler
published
4.34
Rawle Sue-Ho
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.33
Tyler Carroll
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.27
Spencer Llewellyn
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.23
Visakan Jayakumar
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.22
Raymond Xu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.20
Anil Chawla
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.18
Matthew Hanauer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.17
Patrick Grant
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.14
Ryan Sayko
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.11
Stewart Bible
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.10
David Hamrin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.02
Dan Clemson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tyler Carroll + Rawle Sue-Ho8066% games+8.9% vs expected
Spencer Llewellyn + Matthew Hanauer9556% games+6.8% vs expected
Anil Chawla + Spencer Llewellyn2338% gamesnot enough data
Spencer Llewellyn + Visakan Jayakumar4155% gamesnot enough data
Patrick Grant + Raymond Xu4158% gamesnot enough data
Ryan Sayko + Spencer Llewellyn224 matchesnot enough data
Ryan Sayko + Stewart Bible134 matchesnot enough data
Tyler Carroll + Visakan Jayakumar314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Geoff Gisler
8W–7L career · no lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.72
Rawle Sue-Ho
17W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
4.34
Tyler Carroll
22W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
4.33
4.5
Spencer Llewellyn
230W–157L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
4.27
Visakan Jayakumar
24W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
4.23
Raymond Xu
21W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
4.22
4.5
Anil Chawla
63W–49L career · 1 line in 2026
7%91%2%
4.20
4.5
Matthew Hanauer
162W–105L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
4.18
Patrick Grant
19W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
4.17
4.5
Ryan Sayko
78W–106L career · 3 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
4.14
Stewart Bible
15W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
4.11
4.5
David Hamrin
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
23%76%<1%
4.10
4.5
Dan Clemson
20W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
4.02

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.