Teams

PBTC CLAFLIN

2022 TRIO - SOCO · WOMEN 3.5 - TRIO - SOCO

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-04-23vs LTFCS ZELLMANNWon 21
W#1 DoublesBailey Kilmer / Lisa Martin vs Alohalani Kaleo / Kelly Cavanaugh6-4, 7-6
L#1 SinglesAnne Dawid vs Carmen Ekblad3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesPatty Schlesinger / Emily Vidmar vs Lisa VanDeVeer / Lynn Zellmann6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2022-04-09vs CCOC COONSSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBailey Kilmer / Patty Schlesinger vs Allison Flannery / Mary Vanryzin7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesEmily Vidmar / Jenene Holcomb vs Tracy Coons / Claudia Goddard3-6, 6-7
2022-04-02vs LTFCS ZELLMANNLost 03
L#1 DoublesBailey Kilmer / Judy Mitchell vs Kelly Cavanaugh / Alohalani Kaleo3-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesBrenda Claflin vs Carmen Ekblad3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAnne Dawid / Patty Schlesinger vs Lynn Zellmann / Lisa VanDeVeer5-7, 0-6
2022-03-19vs CCOC COONSWon 21
W#1 DoublesLisa Martin / Bailey Kilmer vs Denise Nenoff / Mary Vanryzin6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesBrenda Claflin vs Kathleen Devanny6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesEmily Vidmar / Jenene Holcomb vs Allison Flannery / Suzanne Book6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · WOMEN 3.5 - TRIO - SOCO
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LTFCS ZELLMANN31102577
2PBTC CLAFLIN316613118
3CCOC COONS0421021138

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Bailey Kilmer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.41
Emily Vidmar
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Brenda Claflin
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Patty Schlesinger
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Anne Dawid
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Jenene Holcomb
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emily Vidmar + Patty Schlesinger6258% games+12.8% vs expected
Patty Schlesinger + Anne Dawid3452% games−4.5% vs expected
Patty Schlesinger + Brenda Claflin213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bailey Kilmer
15W–4L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Emily Vidmar
72W–41L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
3.41
3.5
Brenda Claflin
14W–16L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Patty Schlesinger
29W–24L career · 3 lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
3
Anne Dawid
13W–32L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jenene Holcomb
1W–8L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.