Teams

Hills/Feeney/TriLevel4.5M

2024 Hillsborough TriLevel 18 & Over · 4.5

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-08-27vs HCC We Tri To Win - E. PabonWon 10
W#1 DoublesSamuel Biller / Dainius Drukteinis vs Keith Robbins / Hiren Bhatt7-5, 6-0
L#2 DoublesChuck Davis / James Lass vs Anthony Lizares / Brian Stone6-7, 5-7
2024-07-28vs HCC We Tri To Win - E. PabonWon 10
W#1 DoublesChuck Davis / Kevin Platt vs Grant Garlick / Ernie Pabon6-3, 6-1
2024-06-30vs HCC We Tri To Win - E. PabonWon 20
W#1 DoublesSamuel Biller / Gordon Lucas vs Grant Garlick / Keith Robbins6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesChuck Davis / Taylor Garland vs Hiren Bhatt / Jaime Villegas6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Samuel Biller
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.00
Taylor Garland
published
Brian Rockwood
published 4
Daniel Perez
published 4
3.68
James Lass
published
3.61
John Feeney
published
3.59
Chuck Davis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.56
Carl Wilander
published 4
3.49
Jacob Munch
published
3.38
Timothy Sackmaster
published
Cory Frier
published 3.5
Kevin Platt
published
Nacho La Puente
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Samuel Biller
61W–85L career · 2 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
4.24
Taylor Garland
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%50%50%
4.00
4
Brian Rockwood
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Daniel Perez
1W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2024
not enough data
James Lass
3W–9L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
John Feeney
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
21%78%<1%
3.61
4
Chuck Davis
12W–10L career · 3 lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.59
4
Carl Wilander
7W–5L career · no lines in 2024
34%65%<1%
3.56
Jacob Munch
24W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%53%47%
3.49
Timothy Sackmaster
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
81%19%<1%
3.38
3.5
Cory Frier
5W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kevin Platt
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Nacho La Puente
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.