Teams

LCTA18/Kryder/Indepen

18 & Over Combo · 9.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-10-26vs SC 9.5W 18 & Over (Estes)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMccall Rupp / Anita Jain vs Brenna Feirer / Alexandra Dawson3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKaren Warren / Mary-Wallace DeBerry vs Elizabeth Holland / Lianne Wheelock6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesNancy O'Dell-Keim / Alice Kryder vs Kristin Estes / Brooke Walter4-6, 4-6
2025-10-26vs CTC RicheyWon 30
W#1 DoublesMccall Rupp / Amy Templeton vs Kathy Hughes / Christian Fleming6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKaren Warren / Mary-Wallace DeBerry vs Jessica Zaganczyk van der Mije / Kimberly Faust6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesNancy O'Dell-Keim / Ann Harrah vs Tessa Radziej / Lauren Denuel7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2025-10-25vs CTC RicheyLost 12
L#1 DoublesKristen Whitehead / Martha Lee vs Samantha Schuster / Katie Richey6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesNancy O'Dell-Keim / Anita Jain vs Kimberly Faust / Jessica Zaganczyk van der Mije5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKaren Warren / Alice Kryder vs Tessa Radziej / Lauren Denuel6-3, 7-6
2025-10-25vs SC 9.5W 18 & Over (Estes)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesNancy O'Dell-Keim / Amy Templeton vs Brooke Walter / Lianne Wheelock3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesKristen Whitehead / Martha Lee vs Alexandra Dawson / Brenna Feirer7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKaren Warren / Ann Harrah vs Meghan Polk / Elizabeth Holland5-7, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.13 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Anita Jain
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.26
Ann Harrah
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Amy Templeton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.11
Alice Kryder
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.88
Karen Warren
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Haley Powell
published
Kristen Whitehead
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Mary-Wallace DeBerry
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mccall Rupp
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Nancy O'Dell-Keim
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ann Harrah + Alice Kryder2347% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Anita Jain
34W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
4.29
4.5
Ann Harrah
39W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
4.26
4.5
Amy Templeton
8W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Alice Kryder
41W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
4.11
Karen Warren
8W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
3.88
Haley Powell
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kristen Whitehead
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary-Wallace DeBerry
6W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mccall Rupp
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nancy O'Dell-Keim
2W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.