Teams

Henderson/Knoxville

2025 Adult 18 & Over-Knoxville · 3.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.92 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-04-11vs Niethammer/Buckner/ChesneyLost 23
W#1 DoublesJulia Connor / Kayla O'Connor vs Mimi Rust / Heather Ridenour6-0, 6-2
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Justus vs Amanda Niethammer3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Henderson / Anna Kizer vs Madison Coleman / Colbey Keele3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesJennifer Cada vs Ashtyn Wright0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesErika Morris / Katerina Apking vs Kendal Fitzsimmons / Mandi McCrary6-3, 7-5
2025-03-07vs Niethammer/Buckner/ChesneyWon 31
L#1 DoublesSarah Baker / Carly OConnor vs Meredith Buckner / Heather Ridenour1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Cada / Kayla O'Connor vs Jessie Hall / Colbey Keele6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesElizabeth Justus vs Mandi McCrary6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesShannon Thackston / Anessa Savici vs Younsun Choi / Madison Coleman6-3, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Kayla O'Connor
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.00
Elizabeth Justus
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.94
Anessa Savici
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.86
Carly OConnor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.80
Anna Kizer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Shannon Thackston
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Katerina Apking
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.58
2.48
Suzanne Bond
published
2.45
Erika Morris
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
Jennifer Cada
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carly OConnor + Anna Kizer4259% games+10.8% vs expected
Shannon Thackston + Elizabeth Justus5077% gamesnot enough data
Shannon Thackston + Kayla O'Connor224 matchesnot enough data
Erika Morris + Katerina Apking314 matchesnot enough data
Kayla O'Connor + Erika Morris033 matchesnot enough data
Kayla O'Connor + Carly OConnor303 matchesnot enough data
Erika Morris + Carly OConnor213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kayla O'Connor
25W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.07
3
Elizabeth Justus
24W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.00
3
Anessa Savici
43W–29L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Carly OConnor
25W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%85%14%
2.86
3
Anna Kizer
12W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
Shannon Thackston
32W–28L career · 1 line in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
Katerina Apking
24W–14L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%9%91%
2.67
3
Elizabeth Salsbery
5W–10L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
2.58
Suzanne Bond
5W–16L career · no lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.48
2.5
Erika Morris
23W–26L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%64%36%
2.45
Jennifer Cada
4W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.